Talk:Jeff Peckman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Video 1: new section
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.254.192.74 - "→‎Video 1: new section"
Line 20: Line 20:
== Video 1 ==
== Video 1 ==


Video 1 has been removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.254.192.74|71.254.192.74]] ([[User talk:71.254.192.74|talk]]) 05:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Video 1 has been removed.

Revision as of 05:07, 12 October 2008

See Google News Search about this strange story: [1]. Got a splash of widespread news coverage, but may still deserve deletion because Wikipedia is not a newspaper, especially not a sensational tabloid per the policy WP:NOT#NEWS and the essay WP:NOTNEWS. Edison (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still, he managed at least two caases of substantial coverage in reliable sources at the national level in 2003, was on nthe Senate ballot in 1998, and got this coverage. Edison (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sad day for human intelligence

...everywhere. How can people be so stupid?

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.149.115 (talk) 23:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty open minded but this case fails to convince me, it's very suspicious that they haven't released any of the alleged footage and even the still looks unconvincing. That said, I think that the media is approaching this as a curiosity rather than a serious news item, or I hope, so I wouldn't lose faith in common sense just yet.

At any rate this article could do with some fine tuning if it's to stay, I'm a bit conflicted as to whether it even warrants a wikipedia article to be honest. Casshernfan (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The video is a confirmed hoax

Here's the proof. http://rockymountainparanormal.com/ufo/ Video outtake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.252.62 (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the one that claims to be the video, but does not match the screenshot. 98.196.164.63 (talk) 03:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Video 1

Video 1 has been removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.254.192.74 (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]