Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KillAllSpammers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
(2nd) |
Thirdbeach (talk | contribs) eNom further explanation |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KillAllSpammers|KillAllSpammers (2nd)]] === |
=== [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KillAllSpammers|KillAllSpammers (2nd)]] === |
||
{{rfcu box|case=KillAllSpammers|filed=20:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)}} |
{{rfcu box|case=KillAllSpammers|filed=20:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
Original block was against KillAllSpammers, TeerGrub, and 67.150.254.25 for sockpuppetry in the context of edit war. Clerk asked if sockpuppeting IPs should be blocked but I thought it reasonable to wait to see if blocked editor would get the message and stop the disruptive edits. Apparently not, so please check the list of IPs that fit this editor's pattern. They include: |
|||
* {{checkuser|SpamSurgeon}} |
* {{checkuser|SpamSurgeon}} |
||
* {{checkip|4.224.39.29}} |
* {{checkip|4.224.39.29}} |
Revision as of 18:50, 12 October 2008
KillAllSpammers (2nd)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 20:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
Original block was against KillAllSpammers, TeerGrub, and 67.150.254.25 for sockpuppetry in the context of edit war. Clerk asked if sockpuppeting IPs should be blocked but I thought it reasonable to wait to see if blocked editor would get the message and stop the disruptive edits. Apparently not, so please check the list of IPs that fit this editor's pattern. They include:
- SpamSurgeon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: B
- Supporting evidence: KillAllSpammers and sockpuppets were blocked in May following edit war on eNom. SpamSurgeon is similar in name, actions, and modus operandi (disruptive edits on same content as KillAllSpammers, with no comments). The listed IPs also exhibit the same behaviors and their contribs are singularly focused on eNom and closely related article List of domain name registrars. If you're comfortable doing so, please block not only individual IPs but the following ranges:
4.224-226.*.* | |
67.150.252-254.* | |
72.251.75-79.* | |
208.100.249.* | |
216.190.249.* |
History of the article. Thirdbeach (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
KillAllSpammers
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 03:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
- KillAllSpammers (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: E
- Supporting evidence: This user and this IP Address are involved in an edit war at eNom. History of the article. GreenJoe 03:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Confirmed that KillAllSpammers is also TeerGrub (talk · contribs) editing that article. Likely that both 67.150.254.25 and 67.150.252.180 are the same person; he has not used those exact IP addresses but they are in his range.
- The same editor is also 204.62.193.69 (talk · contribs) who was involved in an edit war on the same article on March 17 by editing as TeerGrub and while logged out. Thatcher 11:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk notes:
- Both the master and the one registered sock puppet are blocked and tagged;
- No action taken on the IP addresses; would it be beneficial to block them and/or the range?
- Anthøny 23:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.