User:Piano non troppo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adds me to WikiProject Spam
Mod wording to title
Line 20: Line 20:
I've suggested to libraries they put scratch sheets on the inside covers, so readers can vent. Although they didn't take my suggestion, you can criticize an article on its "Discussion" page. Express your ideas: You'll be surprised how often other people's ideas mesh with yours.
I've suggested to libraries they put scratch sheets on the inside covers, so readers can vent. Although they didn't take my suggestion, you can criticize an article on its "Discussion" page. Express your ideas: You'll be surprised how often other people's ideas mesh with yours.


==Stars and all that==
==Awards==


{| style="border: 0px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
{| style="border: 0px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

Revision as of 02:12, 13 October 2008

I edit, therefore I exist?                                             Memorable locales

The Prancing Pony
Kent
Golden Gate Park

Getting a little assistance

I'm glad to help — I'm a professional writer and editor. General questions about Wiki — I can answer. If you need sources for your Wiki writing or for school, Google Books may be the answer to your dreams: [1].

Why did I delete something that's completely true?

Probably because it wasn't cited. Even if you saw something with your own eyes, if it contradicts what other editors put in the article, your statement needs a reference. Got to have that, or a month from now some editor will come along and just undo it — having no idea where the idea came from.

Reverting vandalism

Common reasons for my edits are in WP:LINKSTOAVOID, WP:SOURCE, WP:SOAP, and WP:SPAM. (The need for good citations that are verifiable and not self-advertising.) It's worth glancing at them occasionally, because they change a bit.

WP:CONTEXT is a time-saver for editors adding Wiki links.

I've suggested to libraries they put scratch sheets on the inside covers, so readers can vent. Although they didn't take my suggestion, you can criticize an article on its "Discussion" page. Express your ideas: You'll be surprised how often other people's ideas mesh with yours.

Stars and all that

The Original Barnstar
For all you do, keep up the good work Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The Anti-Flame Barnstar
in the face of insult, remains calm Miquonranger03 (talk) 05:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
rollback expert, beating everyone to the punch Miquonranger03 (talk) 05:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
A Barnstar!
The Heron Marked Barnstar

I hereby award this Barnstar to Piano non troppo for their conspicuous effort reverting vandalism to The Wheel of Time article. Tai'shar Wikipedia! Nutiketaiel (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


The Anti-Spam Barnstar
Hey Piano non troppo! Lately, when I am following the feed of the linkwatcher bots, and I decide that something may be spam, I often see that you already are there as well, reverting and warning the same editor! Compliments, and thanks for the hard work...In any way, your help is very welcome! Happy editing! Dirk Beetstra T C 10:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Because you really are good at fighting vandalism! ɷ i m b u s a n i a 07:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)