Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Dog: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Switch to keep
Andrzej18 (talk | contribs)
- my vote
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|The Black Dog}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:The Black Dog|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Dog]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Dog|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 12#{{anchorencode:The Black Dog}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|The Black Dog}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:The Black Dog|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Dog]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Dog|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 12#{{anchorencode:The Black Dog}}|View log]])</noinclude>
<strike>Does not give enough proof of notability</strike> '''Keep''': Has improved enough tht I think the deletion is unwarranted. <span style="background: #CCEECC;">[[User:Kickstart70|Kickstart70]]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">[[User talk:Kickstart70|T]]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">[[Special:Contributions/Kickstart70|C]]</span> 17:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
<strike>Does not give enough proof of notability</strike> '''Keep''': Has improved enough tht I think the deletion is unwarranted. <span style="background: #CCEECC;">[[User:Kickstart70|Kickstart70]]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">[[User talk:Kickstart70|T]]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">[[Special:Contributions/Kickstart70|C]]</span> 17:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
** '''Delete''' - without proofing notability it's just an advertise. Maybe this place is specific, but article currently does not confirm it. [[User:Andrzej18|<font color=#075791 face="Comic Sans MS"><b>Andrew</b></font><sub>18</sub>]] [[User_talk:Andrzej18|<sup><b><font color=orange face="Verdana">@</font></sup></b>]] 17:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
** <s>'''Delete''' - without proofing notability it's just an advertise. Maybe this place is specific, but article currently does not confirm it.</s> || After adding sources it's ok. I back away my vote. [[User:Andrzej18|<font color=#075791 face="Comic Sans MS"><b>Andrew</b></font><sub>18</sub>]] [[User_talk:Andrzej18|<sup><b><font color=orange face="Verdana">@</font></sup></b>]] 17:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


* '''Delete''' no particular notability [[User:Clubmarx|Clubmarx]] ([[User talk:Clubmarx|talk]]) 18:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' no particular notability [[User:Clubmarx|Clubmarx]] ([[User talk:Clubmarx|talk]]) 18:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:23, 13 October 2008

The Black Dog

The Black Dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not give enough proof of notability Keep: Has improved enough tht I think the deletion is unwarranted. Kickstart70-T-C 17:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • Delete - without proofing notability it's just an advertise. Maybe this place is specific, but article currently does not confirm it. || After adding sources it's ok. I back away my vote. Andrew18 @ 17:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no particular notability Clubmarx (talk) 18:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability not established Dreamspy (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The Black Dog is pretty well-known, actually. Here are some GNews hits to chew on. Zagalejo^^^ 21:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I have added some additional info to the article, info on link to the Lewinsky scandal, cookbook released, sweatshirt recall, yachting race, and 2006 Retailer of the Year award. Seven cited references added to article. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: WP:WikiProject Massachusetts has been informed of this deletion debate. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: WP:WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands has been informed of this deletion debate. --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Restaurant is well known in New England. JNW (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - while the artical does need alot of work, it is of significant importance in the New England region. I live on the other side of massachusetts and you find people here wearing their t-shirts.--Found5dollar (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as advertising. The article includes little evidence of true notability. A beachside t-shirt shop is not notable, no matter how affluent its customers or who has been photographed wearing its shirts. Aramgar (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are numerous references in the article demonstrating wikipedia-notability (essentially that the place is described in third-party reliable sources). See notability, and actually read it!  :) The nominator's rationale of "not ... enough proof of notability" is blatantly contradicted by references in the article. doncram (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I read the first result from the search linked to by Zagalejo, from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Besides seeming notable enough from what I read in that newspaper's article, it is telling that the newspaper of a major non-New England city would devote a rather large article to this subject. Doncram also makes a good point; I see a number of reliable, third-party sources with significant coverage of this place. AlexiusHoratius 15:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]