Talk:Beacon Hill, Norfolk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:09, 6 February 2006

What do you mean a col is "probable"? It either is, or isn't... Craighennessey 17:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what that means either, it is totally unrelated to the Beacon Hill article so should probably be somewhere else! Rob 06:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not unrelated, since it is the col that determines the hill's prominence. It would be noice to be certain though! Grinner 11:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean that the "A col of 26 metres above sea level at grid reference TM038790, at the confluence of the Rivers Little Ouse and Waveney, is probable." bit is totally irrelevant and unrelated to this article. The location is thirty to forty miles south of the Beacon Hill in the article so I don't see that it relates. See http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=603850&Y=279050&A=Y&Z=5 for the alleged col and http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=618350&Y=341450&A=Y&Z=4 for Beacon Hill. Any ideas?

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :I don't know what that means either, it is totally unrelated to the Beacon Hill article so should probably be somewhere else! [[User:RobertWalden|Rob]] 06:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 ::It's not unrelated, since it is the col that determines the hill's prominence. It would be noice to be certain though! [[User:Grinner|Grinner]] 11:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
+:::No, I mean that the "A col of 26 metres above sea level at grid reference TM038790, at the confluence of the Rivers Little Ouse and Waveney, is probable." bit is totally irrelevant and unrelated to this article.  The location is thirty to forty miles south of the Beacon Hill in the article so I don't see that it relates.  See http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=603850&Y=279050&A=Y&Z=5 for the alleged col and http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=618350&Y=341450&A=Y&Z=4 for Beacon Hill.  Any ideas?