Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia naming issue: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎[[Russia naming issue]]: what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"?
m →‎[[Russia naming issue]]: what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"?
Line 7: Line 7:


==== Discussion ====
==== Discussion ====
Despite the fact that there may be some true facts in this aticle, I see no basis for the existance of the article itself. Just for the record, can someone state in a neutrally-worded sentence or two, what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"? Citation of at least one respectable source would help, too. ''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]]&nbsp;<small>2006-03-20&nbsp;19:29&nbsp;Z</small>''
Despite the fact that there may be some correct facts in this article, I see no basis for the existence of the article itself. Just for the record, can someone state in a neutrally-worded sentence or two, what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"? Citation of at least one respectable source would help, too. ''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]]&nbsp;<small>2006-03-20&nbsp;19:29&nbsp;Z</small>''

Revision as of 19:29, 20 March 2006

Russia naming issue

Found in the cleanup backlog: an unsourced, NPOV, possibly original research article claiming a conspiracy to rename Russia as Muscovy. Unencyclopedic. Merge anything verifiable to Etymology of Rus and derivatives and delete. Alba 18:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete—this seems to be a troll: nothing of merit here, unless someone wants to find references in support of a few facts in the timeline. Michael Z. 2006-03-20 18:25 Z
  • Indeed, the name of Russia predated the name of Muscovy in the western tradition, however unhappy our Polish and Ukrainian friends may feel about the fact. Yet the wording of the article is POVish. It needs to be NPOVed and wikified, that's all. So keep and expand on the model of Name of Ukraine. Or perhaps eventually merge to Etymology of Rus and derivatives? --Ghirla -трёп- 18:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep and cleanup, perhaps merge, but POV problems is not a reason for deletion. Factual information on timeline is totally correct and useful. Interpretations are presented in a partisan and argumentive form. Needs cleanup but not the deletion. --Irpen 19:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Despite the fact that there may be some correct facts in this article, I see no basis for the existence of the article itself. Just for the record, can someone state in a neutrally-worded sentence or two, what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"? Citation of at least one respectable source would help, too. Michael Z. 2006-03-20 19:29 Z