Talk:MapleStory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 72: Line 72:
Should we actually explain what jump quests are under Quests? It says "all jump quests are repeatable with random rewards", but it never actually explains what they are. Should there be information added about them? --[[User:Bobadot|Bobadot]] 20:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Should we actually explain what jump quests are under Quests? It says "all jump quests are repeatable with random rewards", but it never actually explains what they are. Should there be information added about them? --[[User:Bobadot|Bobadot]] 20:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
:Jumping quests are a very unique thing to MS, so i think they should have something written about them. I started off a small section, feel free to edit it. -- [[User:Prod|Prod-You]] 05:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
:Jumping quests are a very unique thing to MS, so i think they should have something written about them. I started off a small section, feel free to edit it. -- [[User:Prod|Prod-You]] 05:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
::I have expanded this a lot under the IP of 72.234.76.209 (forgot to login). If it's a bit too much to be considered general for the article, feel free to edit it. -- [[User:Kalathalan|Kalathalan]]
::I have expanded this a lot under the IP of 72.234.76.209 (forgot to login). If it's a bit too much to be considered general for the article, feel free to edit it. -- [[User:Kalathalan|Kalathalan]] 02:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


== Emotions ==
== Emotions ==

Revision as of 00:09, 26 March 2006

Archives: (March 7, 2006)

General guidelines

Anyone editing this page should read Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computer_and_Video_Games so that in the future, perhaps this article can join that project. -- Prod-Me 03:15, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who wants to work on character or game guides should go to the wikibooks section at Wikibooks:MapleStory. The link is also at the bottom of the article in the External Links section.

Only Notable Fan sites and guides should be kept in the article. Small/new forums and guild websites do not belong. This isn't the place to advertise

Game issues section should only include factual information about existing scams, without including you avoid the scams. Also, please dont link to scam/hack websites.

Refer to sleepywood, hidden street and basilmarket for pricing information, it does not belong here since it is far too volatile and not encyclopedic

Title of Article

Should this be called MapleStory instead? On the game's website, it's always spelt without the space, and staff sign with "MapleStory staff" on the news. Enochlau 06:02, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yea you are right. I looked through the website and it always refers to it as MapleStory. One thing to consider before changing the name is that the wikibooks link probably will break if the name is changed -- Prod-Me 12:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That should be ok - we should be able to move the wikibooks article, or failing that, put a redirect in place. Enochlau 14:02, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Enochlau 14:09, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Naming fads?

I'm considering a section on popular character name fragment fads such as "azn" (for Asian, although this is believed to frequently be used by non-Asians), "viet" (Vietnamese, also probably a false indicator of nationality), "SSJ" (Super Saiya-jin from the Dragonball manga/anime), "Sin" (assassin), and others. I'm a little hesitant since the same fads certainly crop up in other MMOGs - or any type of online community, for that matter. Let me know what you guys think and where (if at all) this kind of topic belongs. The Trashman 07:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

People used azn, viet, and ssj before maple story.

Ludibrium

Is ludibrium part of ossyria or not? --Prod-You 05:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ludibrium is part of Ossyria because the Taiwan official website say it

here the source but its in Chinese [[1]] 24.205.175.89 07:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ludibrium quests appear in the Ossyria tab in quests window afaik--212.149.180.41 19:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

I have semi-protected it because I think this page has seen way more than its fair share of anon vandalism. When you go and edit the page, it says "WARNING: This page has been locked so that only administrators can edit it. Be sure you are following the protected page guidelines.", but if the edit box is white and not grey, then you are able to edit the article; the warning is a little misleading. enochlau (talk) 00:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zakum Dungeon Quest

Because this quest is such a prominent part of other Maplestory versions, I added a section for it here. I'm basing this section mostly on memory, so some inconsistencies may exist. For that reason I did not go into much detail in the article. Cheers.

Personally I don't think its appropriate here. It may be a very popular quest which all people who play the game look forward to....but I think a more general party quest section is far more useful that one about the specific Zakum quest. I'm suggesting it be rewritten. --Prod-You 06:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Zakum is the second strongest monster (I think) so people might want a section for that.Runescape rocks 05:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but with every new island released there are stronger and stronger enemies. He's the strongest now, but there are very few people who are able to fight him, let alone beat him. And in general, maybe 1% of all MS players will actually ever see him (considering it takes soooo long to get to that high a level). He just isn't that important. -- Prod-You 01:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There are currently three monsters (all bosses) which are stronger than Zakum in terms of level in Japanese MapleStory. According to hearsay, however, leveling up at high levels is nigh impossible without at least killing parts of Zakum. I don't know. Maybe it would be more appropriate belonging in a "Boss Monsters" section, wherever THAT would fit.

inappropriate tone

I'm tagging this page under inappropriate tone for the use of the second grammatical person. I know some of you might object, but use of it is highly unprofessional, rude and condescending to the reader because it assumes the reader wants to actually play it, rather than be informed about it. The use is so extensive I would have taken the time to clean it all, but I'm busy at the moment. I hope you can cleanup the second person references, make them in the third person ("players", perhaps). Then the tag can be removed. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 16:07, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. I made quite a few edits, removing all references of "you", to something more formal.
Whoops, I didn't log in before I made the edit. --Antoshi 15:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this not good enough? I thought that what you wanted fixed was the inappropriate tone. Now that it is, why hasn't the tag been removed? --Antoshi 05:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you get the idea that Str and Int increases HP/MP upon lvl up anyways?

Where do you get the idea that Str and Int increases HP/MP upon lvl up anyways? Did you compare the stats of a pure-str and high-dex Warrior? Same thing for luk-less Mage. HP/MP increments are based on the class and the skills. �� Comment by 72.142.162.31 moved from main page by fnfd 05:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it doesn't even work with a mage/warrior. It needs to be tested with beginners, which shouldnt be too bad. I guess I'll try it in a few days to figure out whether or not its true. Make two chars, note hp/mp at level one, go pure str with char that has less hp, int with other one. -- Prod-You 05:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pure INT wizards/clerics only have about 150 more MP at level 50 than someone with a normal LUK build, so you might not notice any difference with a beginner. --PetteriH 10:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wont that be assuming that everyone wants to stay as a beginner?
Well, if its true for a beginner, I'd think its fairly safe to assume its true in general. -- Prod-You 21:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I already said look at the pure-str and high-dex Warriors and luk-less Mages. Then you go say if it works for Beginners it works for all classes.
Plus, you said "Well, it doesn't even work with a mage/warrior."
I dont get your reasoning.
Hmmm, you're right. What i meant to say is, with warriors and mages, they have the skills that increase mp/hp and its better if those aren't included in consideration since results would only apply to those two classes. Anywayz, until its at least tested with beginners i dont think theres a point to arguing. Oh, and to sign your comments, put four tilde's (~) at the end, just easier to see whos commenting rather than checking history. -- Prod-You 00:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh.
Try Str Dit and Luk Dit. 72.142.162.31 21:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)72.142.162.31[reply]
Basically for every STR or INT you have, you will gain one extra HP/MP for each point every time you level up.Runescape rocks 05:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MapleStory Monsters contains no data whatsoever about actual monsters (it appears to have been moved to Wikibooks[2]). The current content of the page sounds more like a subsection of MapleStory than a standalone page. Jude(talk,contribs) 04:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont get...lol
So they want to move the monster list to the first page with the intro and stuff?
It's just moving of info around right?
As long as it presents a neat and professionalism I guess... But I dont get it to begin with...lol72.142.162.31 11:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)72.sumthing.sumthing.xxx[reply]
Basically, MapleStory Monsters contained an extensive list of monsters. At some point in time, this list of monsters was removed from that article, and crossed to the sister-project, Wikibooks, leaving the MapleStory Monsters page deprecated with only a small amount of information in it. I am suggesting that this paragraph be merged into MapleStory, and that MapleStory Monsters be redirected to MapleStory. Jude(talk,contribs) 11:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But like you said, it contains very little information, so i just suggest deleting MapleStory Monsters and keeping Maplestory the wait it is, with the wikibooks link. --69.30.175.59 17:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've put in a redirect, the info is useless and its much simpler than bothering with a delete. --Prod-You 17:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More info about jump quests?

Should we actually explain what jump quests are under Quests? It says "all jump quests are repeatable with random rewards", but it never actually explains what they are. Should there be information added about them? --Bobadot 20:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping quests are a very unique thing to MS, so i think they should have something written about them. I started off a small section, feel free to edit it. -- Prod-You 05:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded this a lot under the IP of 72.234.76.209 (forgot to login). If it's a bit too much to be considered general for the article, feel free to edit it. -- Kalathalan 02:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emotions

Why are people changing the names for F6 and F7? The official names are Confused and What the...? respectively. As straight from the MapleSea website[3]. I have changed them back. However, if anyone can find any conflicting evidence, please do tell. --Bobadot 02:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I've added an "unofficial names" thing below the official names. If you must change the name, change these ones. Because the official names are above them, and they should not be renamed. Maybe you call F5 Insane, but that's unofficial. --Bobadot 06:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cleaned that up a bit, hope you like it. -- Prod-You 07:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Like it? I love it! You're the first person to change the section - besides me - since I added the official names NOT to change them! Though Notes is a little unclear. What about, say, Nicknames instead of Notes? --Bobadot 08:47, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, i just put notes cause thats what the last page i was looking at used. Perhaps common uses or something? i dunno. Give it a day and most of the other common editors should see it. -- Prod-You 09:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I changed it to Nicknames. That should be good enough. --Bobadot 18:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you really play with other versions?

I don't really know but my friend said you can play with other people in different versions, like people from Maple Global can play from people who downloaded it from Thai. Is that really true??

AFAIK, you can play with people on other versions, but you have to download the client for those versions. The client contains all the quest, enemy, item, etc. info and as the other non-global versions have more there would be obvious conflicts. I remember my bro tried out the Japan version. He had to download the Japan client, and everything was in japanese. Also, most certainly you will have to create a new account through the website to play on other servers since accounts arent shared. -- Prod-You 05:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you definitely need to get a seperate account and the game client for the version you wish to play at. --212.149.182.99 09:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sick of the Self-Promoting Screenshots

I just went ahead and removed every image of a screenshot that has someone's in-game name displayed in the picture. The reason for this is because I don't want this article to turn into another popularity contest. People start adding screenshots of themselves "in action", and it does nothing to help the article, it only makes other people more willing to add pictures of themselves as well, then others add themselves and it continues on in a cycle. I also added a blank tag warning users not to add any screenshots with their or other's in-game nick's in the picture to this article. Discuss here. --Antoshi~! T | C 03:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I brought back the pictures. There hasn't been that much trouble on this page with people putting their better pictures since most pictures right now demonstrate something. Getting rid of all the pictures just because they have a name is too broad ranging and we would lose a few good pictures. Some of the pictures could actually be improved and the only way to hint at that is to have the pictures. We just have to stick by reverting useless changes to pictures. -- Prod-You 05:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize, Prod, I realize that you're an active contributing member to this article, but I feel as though I have to challenge your revert. As I said before, these pictures are for the most part self-promotion. Anyone can place a screenshot of themselves and deem it "educational." I feel as though there's plenty of pictures already, and they're all apparently in the Monsters section. A better idea, to keep these screenshots, while elimination self-promoting is to "blank out" the names of the characters in the screenshots. I feel that an Admin may have to be called in to resolve this dispute. --Antoshi~! T | C 19:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen you around a bunch too, and no need to apologize, everyone's say is equal (cept for vandals). For now, only one person has tried putting their pic in (and it was actually a useless pic since all you could see was some skill covering everything). About blanking out names, I feel that unless its done well, it looks kinda ugly. For example the first gameplay image, apart from the weird combination of sunglasses and helm, the blanking out of the name looks out of place. Oddly enough, this image without a name was the one to get changed :P. Perhaps, instead of restricting access, we have a section here of "Requested Screenshots" which discusses which images are need, which need improvement, etc. Any other image changes are rejected. And an admin isn't really needed, we just need more active contributors to add their say. -- Prod-You 19:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is really being shown off in the screenshots without blanked names. In the Character Classes section, yes, everyone is showing off. But most of them are just screenshots to help the article. However, I would like a requested screenshots section. --Bobadot 00:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]