Talk:Triple talaq: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Karzy911 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Drseudo (talk | contribs)
Plagiarism badness
Line 27: Line 27:


I'm not sure whether it's worth linking the msnbc article about the man who accidentally divorced his wife, but I thought it was interesting. The link is [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12038469/ [1]]
I'm not sure whether it's worth linking the msnbc article about the man who accidentally divorced his wife, but I thought it was interesting. The link is [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12038469/ [1]]

== Plagiarism badness ==

Someone cut and pasted the text of [http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_151_200/triple__talaq.htm this article] wholesale at the top of this article. I have removed it. [[User:Drseudo|drseudo]] ([[User_talk:Drseudo|t]]) 04:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:09, 4 April 2006

Didnt this article say something about egyptian tv shows? Where did that go? its not even in the history! Strange....

--Striver 23:50, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

triple Talaq has to happen on three different occasions

Divorce is once at a time, even if I say in anger: "I divorce you" 15 times not 3, it still counts as one, there is a misunderstanding about the Triple talaq and is consdered a Bid'ah ,it is explained better in sura Al-Baqara 227 to 230 .

This Qur'anic passage explains that the act of divorce has to happen on three seperate occasions and most scholars say that a divorce in the heat of anger and the husband says : "I divorce you" it is not binding.

Qur'an chapter 2 to 227 to 230 explain:

227. And if they decide upon divorce, then Allâh is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

228. And divorced women shall wait (as regards their marriage) for three menstrual periods, and it is not lawful for them to conceal what Allâh has created in their wombs, if they believe in Allâh and the Last Day. And their husbands have the better right to take them back in that period, if they wish for reconciliation. And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

229. The divorce is twice, after that, either you retain her on reasonable terms or release her with kindness. And it is not lawful for you (men) to take back (from your wives) any of your Mahr (bridal-money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage) which you have given them, except when both parties fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allâh (e.g. to deal with each other on a fair basis). Then if you fear that they would not be able to keep the limits ordained by Allâh, then there is no sin on either of them if she gives back (the Mahr or a part of it) for her Al-Khul‘ (divorce)[2]. These are the limits ordained by Allâh, so do not transgress them. And whoever transgresses the limits ordained by Allâh, then such are the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).

230. And if he has divorced her (the third time), then she is not lawful unto him thereafter until she has married another husband. Then, if the other husband divorces her, it is no sin on both of them that they reunite, provided they feel that they can keep the limits ordained by Allâh. These are the limits of Allâh, which He makes plain for the people who have knowledge. --The Brain 07:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tell That to Umar and his followers. Shia agree. --Striver 21:48, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I was raised Sunni, they (most) consider it Haraam and has been the subject of comedy abd satire by many sunnis--The Brain 22:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but that dosnt change that there are Sunis that deem it Halal. --Striver 16:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether it's worth linking the msnbc article about the man who accidentally divorced his wife, but I thought it was interesting. The link is [1]

Plagiarism badness

Someone cut and pasted the text of this article wholesale at the top of this article. I have removed it. drseudo (t) 04:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]