User talk:Vision Thing/Archive1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vision Thing (talk | contribs)
Infinity0 (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:


:These links aren't spam. They all talk about socialism and are written by different authors or talk about different aspects of socialism. [[User:Vision Thing|-- Vision Thing --]] 17:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
:These links aren't spam. They all talk about socialism and are written by different authors or talk about different aspects of socialism. [[User:Vision Thing|-- Vision Thing --]] 17:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

That's irrelevant. They're from the same website. -- [[User:Infinity0|<span style="color:red;">infinity</span>]]'''[[User_talk:Infinity0|<span style="color:red;">0</span>]]''' 20:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:04, 25 April 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Vision Thing/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Siva1979Talk to me 14:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet tag

Hi, Vision Thing. Please do not remove the suspected sockpuppet tag from your user page. I suspect that you are a sockpuppet of banned user User:RJII, due to the fact that you have jumped right into debates where RJII left off (see Talk:Anarcho-capitalism for an example) after having only been registered on 19 March. You then immediately began editing pages that RJII had recently been editing (see An Anarchist FAQ -- RJII ceased editing this on 11 March after having been banned from Wikipedia per his probation -- as well as Economics of fascism --- RJII ceased editing this on 8 March, and you jumped right in and continued the little revert war that had been occurring there). Based upon your similar edits and upon the fact that you are a very new user who has a surprisingly in-depth understanding of Wikipedia, I suspect that you are a sockpuppet of RJII. Please do not remove the suspected sockpuppet tag from your user page again. In the meantime, I'm sure that we can clear all of this up. I could be very wrong. Thanks, and happy editing! :) --AaronS 16:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can we clean this up? -- Vision Thing -- 10:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the next step in the process is to have an administrator take a look at the situation. Remember, that tag does not mean that you are a sockpuppet, it just means that someone suspects you. --AaronS 15:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added this question to the administrators' noticeboard. The sockpuppet policy isn't very clear with regard to suspected sockpuppets, so let's see what they have to say. If I'm wrong, no hard feelings, alright? :) --AaronS 16:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Two days have passed and looks like none of administrators is agreeing with you on suspected sockpuppetry. Because of that, I'm removing the tags. -- Vision Thing -- 10:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still a little suspicious. Are you sure you're not me? Prove it. RJII 17:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Anarchist FAQ

In an effort to remove the npov tag, I hope you can express your opinion on the article version represented in this link at the talk page. Thanks. Steve block talk 20:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Vision Thing, please try to keep your personal views of things out of your edits. For example, this edit is extremely weaselly. I'm not going to revert it, because the difference is minimal, but next time please don't bother - it makes you seem very mean and narrow-minded. The paragraph above already said "attempts to explain", saying only "explain" the second time really isn't going to make the reader think any differently. -- infinity0

Saying that the FAQ doesn't explain disputes within anarchist thought would be my POV. Anyway, thanks for not reverting. -- Vision Thing -- 19:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam

Why are you adding about ten links from the same website to the socialism article? -- infinity0 15:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These links aren't spam. They all talk about socialism and are written by different authors or talk about different aspects of socialism. -- Vision Thing -- 17:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's irrelevant. They're from the same website. -- infinity0 20:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]