Talk:List of storms in the 2006 Pacific hurricane season/ACE calcs: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:Disagree, if there are any changes it would be reflected in the end-of-season review by the NHC. We've always done everything operationally (last season's [[Hurricane Adrian]] landfall, for example...) [[User:NSLE|NSL]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">E]]</font> <sub>([[User_talk:NSLE|T]]+[[Special:Contributions/NSLE|C]])</sub> at 04:50 [[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] <small>([[2006-05-30]])</small> |
:Disagree, if there are any changes it would be reflected in the end-of-season review by the NHC. We've always done everything operationally (last season's [[Hurricane Adrian]] landfall, for example...) [[User:NSLE|NSL]][[WP:EA|<font color="green">E]]</font> <sub>([[User_talk:NSLE|T]]+[[Special:Contributions/NSLE|C]])</sub> at 04:50 [[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] <small>([[2006-05-30]])</small> |
||
::If there is further changes, it would be reflected in the end-of-season review. For the time being, ATCF data is the most accurate. [[User:Momoko|Momoko]] |
Revision as of 09:18, 31 May 2006
I've decided to create this page for Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) calculations.
01E.Aletta
- Links are not operational until the advisory is issued.
- Special advisories should be denoted with a "Special" in the ACE column (as they do not count towards the ACE) and the times of future advisories adjusted accordingly.
Adv. | Date | Time | Maximum Sustained Winds (kt) | ACE (104 kt2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 27 May | 3 am PDT | 25 | Special |
2 | 27 May | 8 am PDT | 30 | 0 |
3 | 27 May | 2 pm PDT | 35 | 0.1225 |
4 | 27 May | 8 pm PDT | 35 | 0.1225 |
5 | 28 May | 2 am PDT | 40 | 0.1600 |
6 | 28 May | 8 am PDT | 40 | 0.1600 |
7 | 28 May | 2 pm PDT | 40 | 0.1600 |
8 | 28 May | 8 pm PDT | 40 | 0.1600 |
9 | 29 May | 2 am PDT | 40 | 0.1600 |
10 | 29 May | 8 am PDT | 35 | 0.1225 |
11 | 29 May | 2 pm PDT | 35 | 0.1225 |
12 | 29 May | 8 pm PDT | 30 | 0 |
13 | 30 May | 2 am PDT | 30 | 0 |
14 | 30 May | 8 am PDT | 30 | 0 |
15 | 30 May | 2 pm PDT | 25 | 0 |
Total | 1.2900 |
I think it is better to use ATCF track data[1] than the operational one. Though they are the same for the time being, there are usually adjustments as the more data are received. Momoko
Date | Time | Maximum Sustained Winds (kt) | ACE (104 kt2) |
---|---|---|---|
27 May | 1800 UTC | 35 | 0.1225 |
28 May | 0000 UTC | 35 | 0.1225 |
28 May | 0600 UTC | 40 | 0.1600 |
28 May | 1200 UTC | 40 | 0.1600 |
28 May | 1800 UTC | 40 | 0.1600 |
29 May | 0000 UTC | 40 | 0.1600 |
29 May | 0600 UTC | 40 | 0.1600 |
29 May | 1200 UTC | 35 | 0.1225 |
Total | 1.1675 |
- Disagree, if there are any changes it would be reflected in the end-of-season review by the NHC. We've always done everything operationally (last season's Hurricane Adrian landfall, for example...) NSLE (T+C) at 04:50 UTC (2006-05-30)
- If there is further changes, it would be reflected in the end-of-season review. For the time being, ATCF data is the most accurate. Momoko