Talk:Historicity of Jesus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:35, 16 September 2006

Historicity of Jesus received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11
Talk:Jesus and textual evidence

Luke and Paul

Caesar, I don't think the info about Acts' "we" sections belongs in the section on Paul's epistles, as Acts isn't one of them. This info bears on Luke's sources in his writings, and so I think it belongs under the discussion about the Gospels, as it is already stated that the "traditional" view was that Luke knew Paul, which this is evidence for, and should go in there. So I'm adding it back to that section as well as changing the majority view of dating about Mark, as the majority view, according to that cite, does not have it written that late. Roy Brumback 10:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |-
 |[[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 1|1]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 2|2]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 3|3]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 4|4]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 5|5]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 6|6]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 7|7]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 8|8]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 9|9]] [[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 10|10]]
-[[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 11|11]] <br />[[Talk:Jesus and textual evidence]] |}
+[[Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Archive 11|11]] <br />[[Talk:Jesus and textual evidence]]
+|}
+== Luke and Paul ==
+Caesar, I don't think the info about Acts' "we" sections belongs in the section on Paul's epistles, as Acts isn't one of them.  This info bears on Luke's sources in his writings, and so I think it belongs under the discussion about the Gospels, as it is already stated that the "traditional" view was that Luke knew Paul, which this is evidence for, and should go in there.  So I'm adding it back to that section as well as changing the majority view of dating about Mark, as the majority view, according to that cite, does not have it written that late. [[User:Roy Brumback|Roy Brumback]] 10:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)