Talk:River Mersey: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mergers |
merger completed |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Mergers == |
== Mergers == |
||
I don't think the [[Mersey Estuary]] and [[Runcorn Gap]] articles are necessary: they both have a very small amount of content which could be described in context here. If there are no reasonable objections, I'll merge them. --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] 22:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC) |
I don't think the [[Mersey Estuary]] and [[Runcorn Gap]] articles are necessary: they both have a very small amount of content which could be described in context here. If there are no reasonable objections, I'll merge them. --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] 22:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
:It's been over a week, and no-one has objected, so I've carried out the merge. I've also removed the link to the [[Toxteth riots]]: the implication that these were related to water quality seems rather tenuous to me. --[[User:RFBailey|RFBailey]] 20:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:02, 26 September 2006
the mersey river is dirty and bad for the enviroment and is suronded by factorys that polute it.
-- you might be suprised to learn that in fact the mersey river is the environment
Mergers
I don't think the Mersey Estuary and Runcorn Gap articles are necessary: they both have a very small amount of content which could be described in context here. If there are no reasonable objections, I'll merge them. --RFBailey 22:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's been over a week, and no-one has objected, so I've carried out the merge. I've also removed the link to the Toxteth riots: the implication that these were related to water quality seems rather tenuous to me. --RFBailey 20:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)