Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Eaton Gokmen: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Akradecki (talk | contribs)
comment
Line 8: Line 8:
***'''Comment''' Even if [[User:Jgokmen]] is her, which is hard to prove, s/he still wrote a NPOV article about a notable subject, herself, and as far as I'm concerned it doesn't say she did anything that she didn't do. [[User:Dinosaur puppy|<font style="background:yellow" face="Fantasy" color="darkgreen">T REX</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Dinosaur puppy|<font style="background:darkgreen" face="Tahoma" color="yellow"><b>speak</b></font>]]</sub> 23:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
***'''Comment''' Even if [[User:Jgokmen]] is her, which is hard to prove, s/he still wrote a NPOV article about a notable subject, herself, and as far as I'm concerned it doesn't say she did anything that she didn't do. [[User:Dinosaur puppy|<font style="background:yellow" face="Fantasy" color="darkgreen">T REX</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:Dinosaur puppy|<font style="background:darkgreen" face="Tahoma" color="yellow"><b>speak</b></font>]]</sub> 23:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
***'''Comment''' I just went and read [[WP:VAIN]] and while it says this kind of thing is "strongly discouraged", I think there's room for it to stay. It says that such articles are sent to AfD, where we are, and that "usually" they are deleted. Doesn't say it ''has'' to be deleted. It seems that there's been enough input from other editors, including a general cleanup, that this is now a community-produced article, even if it was started by the subject originally. [[User:Akradecki|Akradecki]] 23:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
***'''Comment''' I just went and read [[WP:VAIN]] and while it says this kind of thing is "strongly discouraged", I think there's room for it to stay. It says that such articles are sent to AfD, where we are, and that "usually" they are deleted. Doesn't say it ''has'' to be deleted. It seems that there's been enough input from other editors, including a general cleanup, that this is now a community-produced article, even if it was started by the subject originally. [[User:Akradecki|Akradecki]] 23:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. If her book was a #1 bestseller, that should make her notable enough for a wikipedia article. [[User:Ultra-Loser|Ultra-Loser]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ultra-Loser|Talk]] | [[User:Ultra-Loser/Comparison of BitTorrent sites|BT sites]]</sup> 02:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:31, 28 September 2006

Jennifer Eaton Gokmen

nn writer, about 100 unique google hits [1] also violates WP:VAIN Giant onehead 19:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, editor of a notable book, Tales from the Expat Harem and has written a couple of books. Also contributes to a notable magazine in Turkey. T REXspeak 20:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, her bibliography is enough to establish notability. Akradecki 22:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment, I'd still like to check on the WP:VAIN violation, I'm almost certain that said subject created her own article. Giant onehead 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment Even if User:Jgokmen is her, which is hard to prove, s/he still wrote a NPOV article about a notable subject, herself, and as far as I'm concerned it doesn't say she did anything that she didn't do. T REXspeak 23:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment I just went and read WP:VAIN and while it says this kind of thing is "strongly discouraged", I think there's room for it to stay. It says that such articles are sent to AfD, where we are, and that "usually" they are deleted. Doesn't say it has to be deleted. It seems that there's been enough input from other editors, including a general cleanup, that this is now a community-produced article, even if it was started by the subject originally. Akradecki 23:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. If her book was a #1 bestseller, that should make her notable enough for a wikipedia article. Ultra-Loser Talk | BT sites 02:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]