Talk:Filioque: Difference between revisions
→"double procession": new section |
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5.4) |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
The lead says "the double procession of the Holy Spirit." Is this a neutral formulation? Shouldn't it be "the procession of the Holy Spirit as double," or something like that? [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></font>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></font>]] 05:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC) |
The lead says "the double procession of the Holy Spirit." Is this a neutral formulation? Shouldn't it be "the procession of the Holy Spirit as double," or something like that? [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></font>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></font>]] 05:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified one external link on [[Filioque]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=803129225 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150221114348/http://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/doctrine to http://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/doctrine |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:53, 30 September 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Filioque article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Filioque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130411015820/http://www.vatican.va:80/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000806_dominus-iesus_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000806_dominus-iesus_en.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781405185394_chunk_g978140518539410_ss1-10
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The "translation" about "pneumatomachi"
The edit I had done and BoBoMisiu has reverted was a trial to do a real translation of the latin sentence. The current version is no translation, but a nonsense. Yes, one can argue about who were the "pneumatomachi" named, but they surely were not those. But that is not the main problem; cut off from the Symbol of the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son simply means something quite different than Spiritus sancti ex Filio processionem ex symbolo absciderunt, and sive is not and, but or. --Mmh (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Mmh: I agree with you, the translation is bad. I'm guessing I added the {{Whose translation}}. I translate it as "just as the Pneumatomachi and theomachi, cut [from] the Creed [the] procession [of the] holy spirit from [the] son". The problem is that this is a controversial subject – e.g. I think pneumatomachi does mean the pneumatomachi heretics, but I cannon substantiate that. Why do you prefer not to use the terms pneumatomachi and theomachi? –BoBoMisiu (talk) 01:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- I fully agree to use the terms pneumatomachi and theomachi (in these consistent forms, not once -chi and once -chists), but—if only possible—without the link to that (already long time non-existent) sect. My main objection were not the terms pneumatomachi and theomachi, but the structure and meaning of the "translated" sentence in general. --Mmh (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Mmh: the sects were extinct but the heresies are referenced. How about if both terms are changed to -machi suffix and change the ... ex symbolo absciderunt phrase while leaving the {{Whose translation}} tag until some future editor finds a reliable translation to cite. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 22:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ok. --Mmh (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Mmh: you see my translation, change it to a compromise translation if you think it would more descriptive. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ok. --Mmh (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Mmh: the sects were extinct but the heresies are referenced. How about if both terms are changed to -machi suffix and change the ... ex symbolo absciderunt phrase while leaving the {{Whose translation}} tag until some future editor finds a reliable translation to cite. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 22:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- I fully agree to use the terms pneumatomachi and theomachi (in these consistent forms, not once -chi and once -chists), but—if only possible—without the link to that (already long time non-existent) sect. My main objection were not the terms pneumatomachi and theomachi, but the structure and meaning of the "translated" sentence in general. --Mmh (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Filioque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/8410/filioque.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anglicancommunion.org/resources/document-library/lambeth-conference/1978/resolution-35-anglican-orthodox-theological-dialogue
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anglicancommunion.org/resources/document-library/lambeth-conference/1988/resolution-6-anglican-orthodox-relations
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716095849/http://www.tyndalehouse.com/TynBul/Library/TynBull_1983_34_04_Bray_FilioqueInHistory.pdf to http://www.tyndalehouse.com/TynBul/Library/TynBull_1983_34_04_Bray_FilioqueInHistory.pdf
- Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.scoba.us/resources/orthodox-catholic/2003filioque.html with https://web.archive.org/web/20100806122533/https://www.scoba.us:80/resources/orthodox-catholic/2003filioque.html on http://www.scoba.us/resources/orthodox-catholic/2003filioque.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/trvalentine/orthodox/stylianopoulos_filioque.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Parenthetical note
Hello:
The following passage from the section on the Procession of the Holy Spirit appears in parentheses, and is unclear, and in part ungrammatical. Can anyone sort it out please?
"(But this is no documentary evidence of this hypothesis. The earliest manuscript of the Symbol is the 9th century. Prior to that, there is not the symbol itself, none of the Christian writers, or even quotes from it.)"
~~vancouveriensis —Preceding undated comment added 00:20, 04 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Vancouveriensis: that was added a few years ago. I edited the grammer. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Filioque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040806145711/http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/2004/documents/ns_lit_doc_20040629_rite_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/2004/documents/ns_lit_doc_20040629_rite_en.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230214737/http://monachos.net/content/patristics/patristictexts/185-maximus-to-marinus to http://www.monachos.net/content/patristics/patristictexts/185-maximus-to-marinus
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
"double procession"
The lead says "the double procession of the Holy Spirit." Is this a neutral formulation? Shouldn't it be "the procession of the Holy Spirit as double," or something like that? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Filioque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150221114348/http://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/doctrine to http://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/doctrine
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- B-Class Christianity articles
- High-importance Christianity articles
- B-Class Christian theology articles
- High-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- B-Class Catholicism articles
- High-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- B-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- Top-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles