Template talk:Certainty sidebar

Is there an order to these subject? it seems to have some, and then it gets all screwed up. can someone please elaborate on the order methology of these subtopics? --Procrastinating@^talk2me 20:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

By looking at the history, looks like that's just how they were added. -b 18:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Cool, in that case, i have reordered them by deterministic attributes.Procrastinating@^talk2me 20:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Could randomness possibly be included in this series? I'm not sure exactly what criteria are used here so I'm not really sure whether it fits in or not. Richard001 06:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Randomness is not an intelligent act of will, as it subverts any intentionality. So, No. This got nothing to do with it.--Procrastinating@^talk2me 12:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps we can be certain of the randomness of the list. Also, I included epsitimology. does anyone disagree to my change? How about doubt and uncertainty? or would that be opposite of what should be on the certainty list? --Tsinoyboi 06:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

I totally disagree. The philisophical teachinhg of the limitaion of knowledge is not a lvevl of our title. it is the faculty of the mind that explores it, not a property of logic and knowledge. Adding this wowuld constitue a like --Procrastinating@^talk2me 08:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)you made a category mistake. Using epiusimological "knowhow" is described under Justified true belief. So said I holding this to be an absolute trancedental Goldy truth..:)

--Procrastinating@^talk2me 11:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, i just added doubt since uncertainty was already on it. Isn't that biased to exclude epistemology? How can u verify "trancedental Godly truth"? Should agnosticism even be on here? Agnosticism is a philosophical position about knowing and what can or can't be known also. How do u know that's true about certainty? Does it comply with WP:V Wp:OR and WP:INDY? --Tsinoyboi 15:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

I thought given the nature of this "article" it was obvious that I was kidding about the Godly trancedental truth thing, lighten up man. I'll try to summerize it. --Procrastinating@^talk2me 08:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Legends, trying to be as quintessential as possbile

• Nihilism -Everything is possibly not true, does not even exist, I dont care.
• Agnosticism -some thing may be other than they seem, it is impossible to know, so irelvant for discussion.
• Uncertainty -Some thing are true, I cant be "sure" which ones.
• Probability -Some thing are true, I have a function to decleare relative truth by relativly negating others.
• Estimation -Some things are true, I can approximate the way these things look like, without "knwoing" them directly.
• Belief -I have no proof, yet I tend to think some are truth.
• Justified true belief -I belive my truth to be so, and They are indeed so.
• Certainty -There are truths, I know them.
• Determinism -Truths are all there is, the world is ruled by dogmatism alone, there are no issues at which relative truths are relevant.

*Doubt -this is the essence of negating certainty, not a level of it's it. Inclusion of this in the list is a category mistake. like putting in a list of fish species the word "Fish" --Procrastinating@^talk2me 08:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah I didn't realize the link to justified true belief was actually the epistimology page. Thanks for the explanation of each term. I kind of see a relationship between these; but is there a way to define what it needs to be? I wouldn't say levels of certainty. The certainty page sure doesn't explain it. I guess they all seem like conclusions. They all involve concluding something as truth or as end of discussion. There's probably more to it. So are these arranged in a specific order or should they be alphabetical? --Tsinoyboi 16:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Could there be a Certainty series specifically for this box?

Oh ya, and do you think these cancel each other out? or can some like agnosciticsm and theism fit together? I guess belief and certainty could fit together. I've been trying to get a discussion on Agnostic theism going and even been working on my own version, User:Tsinoyboi/Agnostic theism, but I won't edit the main page until it's clear that what i wrote fits the policies. --Tsinoyboi 02:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

why is there so much vandalism on this page now and no one just trying to explain why they don't like this box? --Tsinoyboi 16:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)