Dhar Tichitt: Difference between revisions
Ninafundisha (talk | contribs) m →Archaeology: minor fixes, added link to koumbi saleh |
Ninafundisha (talk | contribs) →Archaeology: clarifying settlement patterns and subsistence info |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Archaeology== |
==Archaeology== |
||
This site is considered a Neolithic site. The Neolithic period in Africa is marked by a change from hunter-gatherer lifestyles towards agricultural or pastoralist ones. The Dhar Tichitt region was inhabited by pastoralists around 3600 BCE. Though occupied yearly, some areas were used during the |
This site is considered a Neolithic site. The Neolithic period in Africa (sometimes referred to as the [[Pastoral Neolithic]]) is marked by a change from [[hunter-gatherer]] lifestyles towards agricultural or pastoralist ones. The Dhar Tichitt region was inhabited by pastoralists around 3600 BCE. Though occupied yearly, some areas were used during the rainy season, and others were used in the dry season. During the rainy season, occupation would have centered on the plateau, where there are heavy dry-stone masonry structures. During the dry season, settlements would have been at smaller, more temporary camps in the lowlands, where there would be available water.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Holl|first=Augustin|date=1985-12-01|title=Subsistence patterns of the Dhar Tichitt Neolithic, Mauritania|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01117458|journal=African Archaeological Review|language=en|volume=3|issue=1|pages=151–162|doi=10.1007/BF01117458|issn=0263-0338}}</ref> Sites of these types have been excavated and analyzed by archaeologist Augustin Holl; for example, Site 38 is on the plateau, and Site 46 is found in a sandy lowland depression. |
||
[[Faunal assemblage|Faunal]] evidence at the Dhar Tichitt area is highly diverse and this is not surprising given the history of the area. Cattle, sheep, and goats are the most common faunal remains at Site 36 with these also accounting for the majority of the faunal remains found at the site in general. Other faunal remains at these sites include crocodile, hippopotamus, ostrich, gazelle, fish, and very few representative bones of other animals. Given the amount of faunal remains that are from domesticated animals it is safe to say that this was a pastoralist society. |
|||
[[Paleoethnobotany|Botanical remains]] found at Dhar Tichitt reveal that not only were the people here pastoralists but that they also had some cultivation skills. ''Pennisetum'' or [[bulrush millet]] is the only domesticate found at this site, and was most commonly cultivated during the rainy season at upland settlements. During the dry season, wild grains and fruits were collected in the lowlands to supplement the otherwise pastoralist diet.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
There are two settlement locations at these sites. The first is heavy dry-stone structures and the other is a scattering of archaeological material with no real structures in the area. This evidence supports the hypothesis that there was occupation at two different places during a full year. The heavy masonry would serve well during the rainy season being up on the plateau and the less structural during the dry season down near where the water would be. |
|||
The Dhar Tichitt site had architectural and material culture elements that seemed to match the site at [[Koumbi Saleh]]. In more recent work in Dhar Tichitt, and then in Dhar Nema and Dhar Walata, it has become more and more clear that as the desert advanced, the Dhar Tichitt culture (which had abandoned its earliest site around 2300 BCE, possibly because of pressure from desert nomads, but also because of increasing aridity) and moved southward into the still well watered areas of northern Mali. |
The Dhar Tichitt site had architectural and material culture elements that seemed to match the site at [[Koumbi Saleh]]. In more recent work in Dhar Tichitt, and then in Dhar Nema and Dhar Walata, it has become more and more clear that as the desert advanced, the Dhar Tichitt culture (which had abandoned its earliest site around 2300 BCE, possibly because of pressure from desert nomads, but also because of increasing aridity) and moved southward into the still well watered areas of northern Mali. |
||
| Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
{{Reflist|30em}} |
||
==Further reading== |
|||
*{{citation | last=Holl | first=Augustin | year=1985 | title=Subsistence patterns of the Neolithic, Mauritania | journal=African Archaeological Review | volume=3 | pages=151–162 | jstor=25130453 | ref=none | doi=10.1007/bf01117458}}. |
|||
[[Category:Archaeological sites in Mauritania]] |
[[Category:Archaeological sites in Mauritania]] |
||
Revision as of 21:24, 26 May 2018
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2018) |
| Dhar Tichitt | |
|---|---|
  Dhar Tichitt | |
| Location | Mauritania |
| Coordinates | 18°27′06″N 9°24′19″W / 18.4517°N 9.40528°W |
Dhar Tichitt is a Neolithic archaeological site located in the southwestern region of the Sahara Desert, in Mauritania. It is one of several settlement locations along the sandstone cliffs in the area. The cliffs were inhabited by pastoralists starting at around 3600 BCE and lasted to around 2300 BCE. This area is one of the oldest known archaeological occupation sites in the western part of Africa. About 500 stone settlements littered the region in the former savannah of the Sahara. Its inhabitants fished and grew millet.
Geography
The climate around the Dhar Tichitt region is very arid and hot. However, this was not always the case. Research has shown that the area used to be much more temperate during a time referred to as the Nouakchottian. During this humid phase the area was much more habitable. The Dhar Tichitt region was like this from around 5000 to 3000 BCE. During this time the climate was a mixture of two different seasons, a dry season and a shorter rainy season. At around 2500 BCE there was a change in the climate and it became too dry for people to stay in the area.[1]
Archaeology
This site is considered a Neolithic site. The Neolithic period in Africa (sometimes referred to as the Pastoral Neolithic) is marked by a change from hunter-gatherer lifestyles towards agricultural or pastoralist ones. The Dhar Tichitt region was inhabited by pastoralists around 3600 BCE. Though occupied yearly, some areas were used during the rainy season, and others were used in the dry season. During the rainy season, occupation would have centered on the plateau, where there are heavy dry-stone masonry structures. During the dry season, settlements would have been at smaller, more temporary camps in the lowlands, where there would be available water.[2] Sites of these types have been excavated and analyzed by archaeologist Augustin Holl; for example, Site 38 is on the plateau, and Site 46 is found in a sandy lowland depression.
Faunal evidence at the Dhar Tichitt area is highly diverse and this is not surprising given the history of the area. Cattle, sheep, and goats are the most common faunal remains at Site 36 with these also accounting for the majority of the faunal remains found at the site in general. Other faunal remains at these sites include crocodile, hippopotamus, ostrich, gazelle, fish, and very few representative bones of other animals. Given the amount of faunal remains that are from domesticated animals it is safe to say that this was a pastoralist society.
Botanical remains found at Dhar Tichitt reveal that not only were the people here pastoralists but that they also had some cultivation skills. Pennisetum or bulrush millet is the only domesticate found at this site, and was most commonly cultivated during the rainy season at upland settlements. During the dry season, wild grains and fruits were collected in the lowlands to supplement the otherwise pastoralist diet.[2]
The Dhar Tichitt site had architectural and material culture elements that seemed to match the site at Koumbi Saleh. In more recent work in Dhar Tichitt, and then in Dhar Nema and Dhar Walata, it has become more and more clear that as the desert advanced, the Dhar Tichitt culture (which had abandoned its earliest site around 2300 BCE, possibly because of pressure from desert nomads, but also because of increasing aridity) and moved southward into the still well watered areas of northern Mali.
References
- ^ Holl, Augustin F.C. "Coping with uncertainty: Neolithic life in the Dhar Tichitt-Walata, Mauritania, (ca. 4000–2300 BP)". Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 341 (8–9): 703–712. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2009.04.005.
- ^ a b Holl, Augustin (1985-12-01). "Subsistence patterns of the Dhar Tichitt Neolithic, Mauritania". African Archaeological Review. 3 (1): 151–162. doi:10.1007/BF01117458. ISSN 0263-0338.