Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yahushua: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VfD talk: Yahushua
Format
Line 5: Line 5:
* '''Delete''' Speedy? and I quote, "YAHUSHUA article at Wikipedia: BLOTTED-OUT! (As of 9-25-2006)" The article also mentions having been redireced. This reads like OR or something made up in school one day. It is not referenced[[User_talk:Dlohcierekim| '''Cheers,<font color="#009500"> :) Dlohcierekim''' </font>]] 14:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Speedy? and I quote, "YAHUSHUA article at Wikipedia: BLOTTED-OUT! (As of 9-25-2006)" The article also mentions having been redireced. This reads like OR or something made up in school one day. It is not referenced[[User_talk:Dlohcierekim| '''Cheers,<font color="#009500"> :) Dlohcierekim''' </font>]] 14:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
**Yes, the "blotted out" comment refers to its redirection to [[Yeshua]]. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 14:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
**Yes, the "blotted out" comment refers to its redirection to [[Yeshua]]. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 14:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
:It ''seems'' to be saying "this is an alternative spelling of Joshua, Yeshua, etc and I want it to have a standalone article rather than a redirect and if it isn't I'm going to scream and scream until I'm sick" (that's how I read "''If other people can post their variations of the name and not have theirs "blotted" out, than this version has the right to stay as well.''", anyway). Tough. '''Redirect''' to [[Joshua]] unless the author can provide any [[WP:V|verifiable]] evidence that Yahushua (as opposed to Joshua, etc) is anything more substantive than Yet Another Way Of Transliterating From Hebrew To Latin Characters. [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 14:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
*It ''seems'' to be saying "this is an alternative spelling of Joshua, Yeshua, etc and I want it to have a standalone article rather than a redirect and if it isn't I'm going to scream and scream until I'm sick" (that's how I read "''If other people can post their variations of the name and not have theirs "blotted" out, than this version has the right to stay as well.''", anyway). Tough. '''Redirect''' to [[Joshua]] unless the author can provide any [[WP:V|verifiable]] evidence that Yahushua (as opposed to Joshua, etc) is anything more substantive than Yet Another Way Of Transliterating From Hebrew To Latin Characters. [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 14:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - This is a badly written gibbering wreck of an article! Completely POV (Just look at the opening). Not sure why we are going to AfD, since the guy who removed the speedy and added an AfD (I think) seems to be pushing for delete anyway! [[User:The Kinslayer|The Kinslayer]] 14:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - This is a badly written gibbering wreck of an article! Completely POV (Just look at the opening). Not sure why we are going to AfD, since the guy who removed the speedy and added an AfD (I think) seems to be pushing for delete anyway! [[User:The Kinslayer|The Kinslayer]] 14:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
**Because the article doesn't seem to meet the [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion criteria]]. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 14:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
**Because the article doesn't seem to meet the [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion criteria]]. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 14:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:22, 7 November 2006

Yahushua

Yahushua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I don't know what this article is supposed to be about, but it seems to be a duplicate of Joshua, Yeshua, Yeshu, and/or Jesus. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Speedy? and I quote, "YAHUSHUA article at Wikipedia: BLOTTED-OUT! (As of 9-25-2006)" The article also mentions having been redireced. This reads like OR or something made up in school one day. It is not referenced Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, the "blotted out" comment refers to its redirection to Yeshua. - Mike Rosoft 14:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems to be saying "this is an alternative spelling of Joshua, Yeshua, etc and I want it to have a standalone article rather than a redirect and if it isn't I'm going to scream and scream until I'm sick" (that's how I read "If other people can post their variations of the name and not have theirs "blotted" out, than this version has the right to stay as well.", anyway). Tough. Redirect to Joshua unless the author can provide any verifiable evidence that Yahushua (as opposed to Joshua, etc) is anything more substantive than Yet Another Way Of Transliterating From Hebrew To Latin Characters. Tonywalton  | Talk 14:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This is a badly written gibbering wreck of an article! Completely POV (Just look at the opening). Not sure why we are going to AfD, since the guy who removed the speedy and added an AfD (I think) seems to be pushing for delete anyway! The Kinslayer 14:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]