User talk:Dennnnis: Difference between revisions
Rex Germanus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Hi, you recently flooded a section of the Dutch people section with cite-tags. I would like to inform you that I removed them. Xenophobe as well as the other references in that section are reputable and are considered excellent sources. The section in question is one of controversies and the I and the other regular editors of the article in question hence try to source most if not the entire section. Demanding scientific sources is really pointless as it mostly concerns etiquette and culture. |
Hi, you recently flooded a section of the Dutch people section with cite-tags. I would like to inform you that I removed them. Xenophobe as well as the other references in that section are reputable and are considered excellent sources. The section in question is one of controversies and the I and the other regular editors of the article in question hence try to source most if not the entire section. Demanding scientific sources is really pointless as it mostly concerns etiquette and culture. |
||
[[User:Rex Germanus|Rex]] 18:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Rex Germanus|Rex]] 18:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Hey. Don't want to say the obvious, but Xenophobe is not a scientific analysis and is not appropriate as a encyclopedic source at all. |
|||
:"Demanding scientific sources is really pointless as it mostly concerns etiquette and culture." |
|||
Jeez. This attitude explains the entire article. Without proper sourcing the opinions in the mentioned section are original research and should be deleted as such. [[User:Dennnnis|Dennnnis]] 19:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:15, 28 November 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Dennnnis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Arnoutf 20:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Dutch people
Hi, you recently flooded a section of the Dutch people section with cite-tags. I would like to inform you that I removed them. Xenophobe as well as the other references in that section are reputable and are considered excellent sources. The section in question is one of controversies and the I and the other regular editors of the article in question hence try to source most if not the entire section. Demanding scientific sources is really pointless as it mostly concerns etiquette and culture. Rex 18:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey. Don't want to say the obvious, but Xenophobe is not a scientific analysis and is not appropriate as a encyclopedic source at all.
- "Demanding scientific sources is really pointless as it mostly concerns etiquette and culture."
Jeez. This attitude explains the entire article. Without proper sourcing the opinions in the mentioned section are original research and should be deleted as such. Dennnnis 19:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)