Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Harris (Pennsylvania politician): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
*'''Delete''' - non-notable failed election candidate. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non-notable failed election candidate. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 07:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', failed candidates are usually non-notable, unless they made something very well known or assert notability before. [[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Terence Ong|nc]][[User talk:Terence Ong|e Ong]] 14:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:54, 29 November 2006

Mark Harris (Pennsylvania politician)

Mark Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unsuccessful candidate for State House in PA. Non-notable person otherwise. Holds no other office. I actually supported the guy and sent him a few bucks. But the reality is that he won't be running for any notable office until 2008 so maybe in two years, he can be brought back. Montco 03:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and don't bring him back until after he's elected to something. Candidacy is not, in itself notable. Fan-1967 04:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not sufficiently notable. Thousands of people run for their respective state legislatures every two to four years. That fact alone does not make them worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia Jacob1207 04:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non-notable failed election candidate. MER-C 05:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 07:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, failed candidates are usually non-notable, unless they made something very well known or assert notability before. Terence Ong 14:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]