Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pflanzgarten: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Yet, again
→‎Pflanzgarten: Another new one
Line 32: Line 32:


:Most recently used in reverse chronological order:
:Most recently used in reverse chronological order:
:*{{checkuser|Ehra}}
:*{{checkuser|Bugatti Veyron}}
:*{{checkuser|Bugatti Veyron}}
:*{{checkuser|Nivelles}}
:*{{checkuser|Nivelles}}

Revision as of 01:23, 7 December 2006

Pflanzgarten

Code letters:

  • C: Diffs throughout Jim Clark history.
  • E: All of the aforementioned diffs in Jim Clark are reverts.
  • F: The blockee has not engaged in any discussion.

A revisit of the already-blocked Pflanzgarten case... My hope is that sleeper socks can be found by Checkuser and pre-emptively blocked so Jim Clark could at least be left on semi-protect. Otherwise, long term full protection may be necessary. (Essjay suggested I try here.)

The same sockery is going on at de:Jim Clark and included de:Benutzer:Pflanzgarten.

Edit counts are well into the hundreds.

Known sock IPs and IP ranges:

Known socks:

History/evidence (chronological):

Any assistance would be appreciated. It would be a shame to have to fully protect the article over such silliness. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


information Note: Obviously, I can't check tens of thousands of IPs and block everyone using them, so what would be best here is to list the accounts he's used most recently, and the IPs he's currently using, and I can check from there. If he's skipping around ranges, though, there is no way I can find him without blocking a lot of innocent users. Essjay (Talk) 07:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most recently used in reverse chronological order:
These are all just since the page was unprotected by me on 2006-11-22. Before that:
In de:Jim Clark, it always seems to be de:Benutzer:Coventry Climax and de:Benutzer:Pflanzgarten, neither of whom appear to have been blocked despite all this. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pflanzgarten}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Pflanzgarten

These accounts have only been used to edit one article - Jim Clark. The same edit/revert is always made (at least since Aug-4). Pflanzgarten was blocked for 3RR on Sept-17 (24hr) (WP:AN3) and has not since edited. Burneville was blocked for 3RR on Sept-26 (12hr) (WP:AN3) and again on Sept-27 (48hr) (talk page). Zandvoort began making the same edits later on Sept-27 (22 hours later) and was blocked on Sept-28 (48hr) (WP:AN3). If Zandvoort is same as Burneville, then this is clear policy voilation of attempted block evasion. After Midnight 0001 03:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pflanzgarten is back after the block - with the identical revert. -- Ian Dalziel 01:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:Pflanzgarten is again as of 1st October still reverting this article in an identical manner to the above mentioned suspected socks. M100 10:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined Obvious. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Pflanzgarten&oldid=92594339"