User talk:Heilme: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:16, 5 January 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Heilme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 19:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Superpower - China

I am happy to discuss these points, but get tired of reverting, let's come to a conclusion before we revert our points again. I am changing them to what they were before the dispute due to the fact that those points have been accepted for many months. See talk on the page in question.203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the section on the Talk Page of the article in question.203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updated203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to Military Power 203.214.2.59 08:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have signed in to Wikipedia, User 203.214.2.59 is now Nobleeagle. Thanks.Nobleeagle 02:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

202.22.246.26

I have noticed this user and am spending my time reverting his edits onto Potential Superpower - India, from my Point of View he is very against India, deleting simple and acceptable points like 'Economic Growth' and 'Benign'.

Potential Superpower - India

I disagree with your views on this topic but wish to discuss in a similar way to the China discussion before making unnecessary reverts. Please see the talk page.Nobleeagle 06:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied

Potential Superpower - European Union

About your comments on that talk page. Please read the article What Wikipedia is NOT. Wikipedia is not debate forum for you to offer your political commentary on world events, it is an unbiased resource. Please treat it as such. Thank you. Kevlar67 06:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet

Well, I think that's kinda rare in most pages, and it's already wikified in the first place. But I guess that's ok. —Khoikhoi 03:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right—as much as I want "Tibet" to most commonly refer to the historical/cultural region, most news sources will talk about Tibet and then show a map of the TAR. They seem to ignore the fact that Qinghai and western Sichuan are still mostly Tibetan-inhabited (but not for long if current trends continue). Oh well. —Khoikhoi 03:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to this edit, are you sure the TAR accounts for most of historic Tibet? If you look at the map, it looks about 50/50. —Khoikhoi 09:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Historic Tibet is basically the Tibetan Plateau, more or less. —Khoikhoi 09:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm typing at 3:00 in the morning! —Khoikhoi 09:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject?

Please see this. Nobleeagle (Talk) 04:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Next step for the Project

Thanks for your support of the new upcoming International Relations WikiProject. Please see Talk:Superpower and vote... Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flood in Chinese Characters

Thanks for informing me. I've voted. And yes this boat = ark thing is just the tip of an iceberg. The original publication had lots of other examples shoehorning Christian doctrine into Chinese characters. In short none of them have any basis. --Yenchin 23:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 ==Flood in Chinese Characters==
 Thanks for informing me. I've voted. And yes this boat = ark thing is just the tip of an iceberg. The original publication had lots of other examples shoehorning Christian doctrine into Chinese characters. In short none of them have any basis. --[[User:Yenchin|Yenchin]] 23:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
-==Unblock me==
-{{unblock reviewed| |dynamic autoblocks}}
-*Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.
-You were blocked by RadioKirk for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
-Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Ferick". The reason given for Ferick's block is: "self-admitted sock of User:Nookdog and User:216.164.203.90".
-Your IP address is 64.233.173.80.
-*Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.
-You were blocked by Gwernol for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
-Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Nookdog". The reason given for Nookdog's block is: "Self-admitted vandal account".
-Your IP address is 64.233.173.81.
-:Hmm, not too much we can do if you're on a IP range constantly used by vandals... sorry, but it's not your fault. See [[Wikipedia:Autoblock]]. '''[[User:Sasquatch|Sasquatch]]'''  [[User_talk:Sasquatch|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|c]] 18:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
-::It seems that the block appears randomly. None of the above is my IP and I don't know how it got there in the first place. Anyways, it is working much better now. Thanks! [[User:Heilme|Heilme]] 22:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)