Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Google
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Quarl (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 13 February 2007 (AFD closed; result: Delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 21:29Z
The Church of Google
- The Church of Google (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Church of Google (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (added by closing admin)
Article is about non-notable, satirical website. Created within the last month and clearly intended to promote a personal website. The article was also previously endorsed for deletion on 12/20/2006. Why it came back, is anybody's guess. Dr. Cash 20:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete db-repost. JuJube 02:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --MaNeMeBasat 14:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete if confirmed to be repost. Otherwise slow delete as non-notable verging on nonesense (though I guess that's more the site than the article). WjBscribe 05:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I was really in doubt when I created this article, and hence I'm not going to discuss whether it should be deleted or not. I am not the owner of the Church of Google page, nor have I any affiliations with the page, I just stumbled across it and it seemed to me that it was mentioned and linked to from many places. It also had a lot of hits when searching for the string on Google. I would also like to say that I did not know that the page had been deleted before and it is therefore not a repost.Snailwalker | talk 11:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment CSD-G4 doesn't apply, so I've removed the tag. 〈REDVEЯS〉 11:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.