Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported something
This is a list of times when at least 100 Wikipedians (ideally excluding sock puppets) actually explicitly voted in support of something.
This page was created in May 2005 in reaction to the first admin candidate to receive 100 supports. The only previous cases of this happening were in Arbitration Committee elections. Due to the increasing number of Wikipedians, 100 supporting votes is no longer as rare, and WP:200 (Times that 200 Wikipedians voted support for something) now exists, as does WP:300 and even WP:400.
Arbitration Committee Elections
- Jwrosenzweig - 107
- Raul654 - 100
- Theresa Knott - 265
- Raul654 - 216
- Ambi - 203
- Sannse - 187
- Neutrality - 171
- David Gerard - 166
- Grunt - 162
- Fennec - 161
- Mirv - 159
- Cecropia - 159
- James F. - 155
- Ed Poor - 144
- Hephaestos - 140
- Charles Matthews - 132
- 172 - 124
- The Cunctator - 124
- Dante Alighieri - 101
- Mindspillage - 299
- Charles Matthews - 253
- Fred Bauder - 251
- Filiocht - 226
- Jayjg - 226
- SimonP - 187
- James F. - 181
- Dmcdevit - 177
- Ilyanep - 153 (not appointed)
- Merovingian - 153 (not appointed)
- Dbiv - 152 (not appointed)
- Morven - 143
- Kelly Martin - 133 (withdrew)
- Jpgordon - 128 (not appointed)
- Kim Bruning - 128 (not appointed)
- Improv - 125 (not appointed)
- Sam Korn - 124
- Nandesuka - 104 (not appointed)
- Mackensen - 103
- Redwolf24 - 100 (withdrew)
- Also, 13 candidates got over 100 votes to oppose them, of whom six got over 150. One candidate had the dubious honor of having over 100 supports and over 100 opposes.
- Can't sleep, clown will eat me - 303 (not appointed)
- UninvitedCompany - 254
- Flcelloguy - 252
- Blnguyen - 241
- Kirill Lokshin - 235
- Paul August - 220
- FloNight - 204
- Geogre - 182 (not appointed)
- Radiant! - 181 (not appointed)
- Jpgordon - 180
- Will Beback - 175 (not appointed)
- Daniel.Bryant - 141 (not appointed)
- Alex Bakharev - 133 (not appointed)
- Samuel Blanning - 132 (not appointed)
- Also, 4 candidates got over 100 votes to oppose them.
- Phaedriel (2nd) - 271 in support
- Danny - 256 in support, 118 in opposition (first time opposition over 100)
- Can't sleep, clown will eat me (3rd) - 246 in support
- Daniel.Bryant (2nd) (username changed to Daniel) - 233 in support
- Newyorkbrad - 225 in support
- Crzrussian (2nd) - 194 in support
- Gracenotes - 186 in support (in progress)
- ProtectionBot - 185 in support (a bot, withdrawn after less than 4 days)
- BD2412 - 183 in unanimous support
- Werdna (4th) - 181 in support (RfA failed, consensus not reached)
- Persian Poet Gal - 179 in unanimous support
- AmiDaniel - 169 in support
- Blnguyen - 160 in support
- Sarah Ewart - 160 in support (username changed to Sarah)
- Rama's Arrow (2nd) - 159 in unanimous support
- Sean Black (2nd) - 159 in support
- Lord Voldemort (3rd) - 156 in support
- Xoloz - 144 in support
- AzaToth (4th) - 143 in support
- Rob Church (4th) - 142 in support (RfA failed, consensus not reached)
- Bookofjude - 141 in support
- Alphachimp - 138 in support
- Khoikhoi (2nd) - 136 in support
- Riana dzasta (username changed to Riana) - 135 in support
- Misza13 - 132 in support
- TawkerbotTorA - 132 in support (a bot, consensus not reached)
- WJBscribe - 131 in support
- JoshuaZ - 130 in support
- William M. Connolley (2nd) - 129 in support
- Tawker (2nd) - 129 in support
- Rune.welsh - 128 in unanimous support
- The Rambling Man - 128 in unanimous support
- Encephalon - 125 in support
- Ryulong (3rd) - 125 in support
- Lightdarkness - 124 in support
- Pascal.Tesson (2nd) - 124 in support (in progress)
- Tariqabjotu (2nd) (Joturner) - 124 in support
- Joturner (2nd) - 123 in support (withdrawn)
- Pilotguy - 120 in support
- Thatcher131 - 120 in support
- Coelacan - 118 in support
- Can't sleep, clown will eat me - 117 in support (RfA failed, consensus not reached)
- Nilfanion - 117 in support (no oppose, one neutral)
- Samir (The Scope) - 114 in support
- Humus sapiens - 114 in support
- Proto (2nd) - 113 in support
- Carnildo (3rd) - 112 in support
- Func - 112 in unanimous support
- Srikeit (2nd) - 112 in support
- Yannismarou - 112 in support
- Arjun01 - 111 in support
- CBDunkerson - 111 in support
- DGG - 111 in support
- Kylu - 111 in support
- Moreschi (2nd) - 111 in support
- Ta bu shi da yu (3rd) - 111 in support
- W.marsh (2nd) - 111 in unanimous support
- Aaron Brenneman (2nd) - 110 in support
- Ambuj.Saxena - 110 in support (RfA failed, consensus not reached)
- Interiot - 110 in unanimous support
- Tangotango - 109 in unanimous support
- Bishonen - 109 in support
- Lar - 109 in support
- Anthony.bradbury (2nd) 108 in support
- Dweller - 108 in unanimous support
- Gator1 (2nd) - 108 in support (no oppose, one neutral)
- Cyde - 106 in support
- Bucketsofg - 105 in support
- Grandmasterka - 105 in support
- Redvers - 105 in support
- Nae'blis - 104 in unanimous support
- Yanksox - 104 in support
- Where (2nd) - 103 in unanimous support)
- JzG - 102 in support
- Canadian-Bacon - 101 in support
- Jaranda (7th) - 101 in support
- MarkGallagher (2nd) - 100 in unanimous support
- MER-C (2nd) - 100 in support (consensus not reached)
- Essjay - 143 in support
- Mackensen - 140 in support (no consensus)
- Linuxbeak (2nd) - 120 in support
- Cecropia (2nd) - 116 in support
Regarding policy
- Unremarkable people - 120 to implement
- Attack pages - 110 to implement
- 126 users endorsed this Request for Comment.
- Double listing - 216 are supporting and 108 are opposing
- 103 voted in favor of the policy.
- 159 voted to implement the enforcement.
- Userbox debate
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin/Original - 127 to endorse the view that Kelly Martin abused her sysop powers
- Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions - 185 to keep
- Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll - A double listing, 163 in favor and 102 against
- Wikipedia:May Userbox policy poll - 105 in favor of moving userboxes to a userbox namespace, as proposed by User:TheTrueSora
- 252 voted in favor of the proposed policy, and it was rejected!
- 104 voting in support of the policy in straw poll.
- Of the two options in favour of the policy, 97 voted for option A and 126 for option B, a total vote in favour of 223 (to 11 against).
Deletion
- 111 votes to delete.
- Approximately 111 supporting Overturning/keeping the article, and approximately 70 supporting Endorsement of the deletion/deleting at its closure by Thebainer.
- The 13th Daniel Brandt Articles for Deletion, began 2 March 2007.
- Approximately 107 Wikipedians supporting retaining the article, and approximately 39 supporting removal as of 6 March 2007.
Other
- 128 people voted to support to making some sort of commemorative effort in the Jordanhill railway station, it being the location described in the 1,000,000th Wikipedia article.
- 202 Wikipedians supported the inclusion of the images of cartoons in the article
- A double listing, 687 support changing the main page and 213 oppose.
- 189 votes supporting option 1 and 115 votes supporting option 3 (as this was an approval vote, some users voted for both).
- About 145