Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search Engine Land

Search Engine Land

Propose Delete, since this article is not noteworthy as is basically an ad for a website that sells ads, why should it be in Wiki? Look at the cites, one or two words in a cite and some do not mention this site at all. This is just a website that gets paid for advertising.Akc9000 03:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong Keep~~ - This news site is considered one of the leadings sources of news about the search engine marketing industry, as shown by its numerous citations in the traditional press. This source was deemed reliable by consensus during the successful featured article nomination of search engine optimization . [1] Jehochman ^Talk 06:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There are no third-party sources about the subject. If you could improve the article with some industry news from reliable sources that discuss the set-up or the work of the company then it would be more acceptable. As is said above, a few minor citations in other news articles is not sufficient, and the Finance Visor article is basically a redistributed press release from the Company. If this site was important enough then someone would have written about it independently. -- Sparkzilla talk! 07:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not particularly noteworthy, smacks of advertising. cornis 13:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Danny Sullivan (technologist), until such time as this article can be more than a stub. I've copied over the content already. For the sake of developing a consensus, I have changed my position. Jehochman ^Talk 13:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reuters cited it as 'search engine land blog' so....for now the best place for it would be on Danny Sullivan's page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Statisticalregression (talk • contribs)