Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gzlfb

User:Gzlfb

This userpage violates a myriad of WP:User page policies. It is essentially a weblog detailing activities of the user, including promotion for the user's election campaign, as well as approximately 4 pages of unrelated and promotional links. Ioeth 19:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep The "four pages of unrelated and promotional links" include one of the more impressive links of search engines, which I may well borrow for my own page, and a list of articles in which the editor is interested. If his interest arises from their being elections in which he has run, so what? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On a sidenote, the List of search engines article is rather impressive collection as well. --Ioeth 19:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep despite my own personal preferences. Editor has been around, sporadically, for some months now, and has appeared to edit some of the articles he wants to watch. I don't like it, but it seems to be acceptable within policy. John Carter 19:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per my reasoning in the essay Wikipedia:Editors matter. This user is actually editing articles, so he's not abusing his userspace as a free webhost; he is clearly interested in contributing to the encyclopedia. Deleting this page will accomplish nothing, and is likely to drive him away. Walton^One 20:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Walton One. nat^tang 08:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Walton's fabulous essay. Besides, I like it, and it's certainly not doing the community any harm, whereas deleting it may.--WaltCip 13:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's just badly formated, otherwise useful. This user is a good contributer--Phoenix 15 17:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Keep (Biased) If only my Vancouver_municipal_election,_2008 Startup was placed here, I had little interest in involving myself too much since I will run, however I do isolate myself, nice to see some people here aren't the bot happy N*zis that others I run into are, I have web sites, sometimes this site is lucky (after they annoy me, and alot with this) to get linked, now with a returned favour "nofollow" since I think it's cheating to take a follow and not send one back, especially when using sources and bibiography; why should they be cheated out of google ranking; your right it's a user page, maybe even "nofollow" should be limited to those; they slandered me a spammer; why I rarely bother is no shock, I am even here as skeptic and rarely get proven wrong.--G-Spot 16:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)