Talk:Rose Jackson

	Australia portal Rose Jackson is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2005. The result of the discussion was delete.

The article was subsequently recreated with different content.Blnguyen | rant-line 00:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for deletion on 9/8/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Bombastic, Misandric, Feminist Extremist

Delete this article permanently. It has been nominated twice, the first time, an overwhelming consensus to strike this girl from wikipedia was reached. The second time, she was prepared and stacked the vote with usernames appropriated just for the task of saving her vanity article. This third time, reason must be heard.

This girl is utterly frightening. The spawn of feminist ABC Journalists is nothing short of breathtakingly frightening. I cannot believe this insane person is given such exposure. What a loudmouth, brainwashed, puff of air this person is.--0001 12:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Current NUS president. Sources: [1], [2], [3]. [4]

-- CHANLORD ^[T]/_[C] 16:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

0001

I feel sorry for you 0001.Esmehwp 13:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

0001 has clearly demonstrated that their true agenda - wanting this entry deleted because they don't like the person it's about?

Whether or not you LIKE Rose Jackson, she is last year's president of the NATIONAL Union of Students. She is the daughter of a very popular and well known five-time Walkley Award winning journalist, she IS on Australian television frequently as a political spokesperson for youth, and she clearly is set for a long and prominent involvement in Australian public life.

The article is unbiased, referenced, accurate and relevant, and deserves to stay, even if it hurts 0001's feelings. Puremyth 14:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This justification was added to an old AfD.. --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 02:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just searched her name after watching her on TV for the dozenth time, and got to this deletion page! it is stupid for people who are not knowledgable of something to show their ignorance by deleting information. she is THE icon of young labour, Whenever the Australian media is covering politics of the youth or the left she is the person they show also she has been in numerous debates on tv, just tonight she was on the ABC's "difference of opinion" an hour long primetime prestigous debate show with 4 panelists she being one. ABC might not mean anything to nerds in USA but it is similar in stature to BBC and if you don't know what I mean by that then god help WP, she is destined to be one of australia's leaders in the near future (not that I'm particularly happy about that!) and possibly a future PM (thats prime minister) but this just shows how closed minded and ignorant and arrogant you are take a look at yourselves in the mirror, you need to realise your knowledge is very limited, don't delete things you don't know anything about. there should be a full article on her as she is (for better or worse) shaping the entire debate around the future of australian politics. just because something is not mentioned a billion times by geeks on the internet doesn't mean it is not important. seriously think about how arrogant you have just been and don't repeat it in the future, you'll rarely get someone who both understands the significance of some topic that you are ignorant of AND knows how wikipedia works and can stop you from making your mistakes so err (by far) on the side of inclusion as your understanding like everyone else's is limited and your access to information is also limited to what people like yourself choose to make available online.Esmehwp 13:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]