Talk:Domperidone

Pharmacology Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Promotive

The article has a clear bias in favor of the Jansen pharmaceuticals, Domperidone and ridicules FDA's decision as well as making unverified claims such as the ban on this drug results in its import from Canada. Non-encyclopedic claims are also made such as "prominent" doctors reject FDA's ruling on the drug. Who is a prominent doctor? Is there a list? I myself as a GP know a doctor has a range of anti-emetics to prescribe, and the ban on domperidone will not affect my ability to treat a patient even the slightest as there are more effective, better alternatives to prescribe. Claims that the ban on this drug results in foreign illegal imports is a pure speculation, with no practical basis, designed to create pro-jansen hysteria about this drug. I guess a Jansen representative is luring around Wikipedia. I will remove any unverified claims or claims that are citations from unreliable sources. I would also like to remind people this is not a magazine nor a newspaper. --78.86.117.164 15:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]