Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Melbourne teenage DVD controversy

News article that has had no developments in thirteen months except for the boys being sentenced Will ^(talk) 22:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It looks pretty useful to me. Just because there are no new developments, doesn't mean that it should be deleted. Tavix 00:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:BLP1E. Will ^(talk) 00:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable incident with plenty of sources. The article needs a bit of work but the nominator provides no reason why this article should be deleted. Capitalistroadster 00:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I have. It's a news article, and the main subjects are notable for only one event. Will ^(talk) 01:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. —Capitalistroadster 00:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The controversy is certainly interesting. I'm not Australian but will this have influence beyond the shock value and backlash caused by this incident? There aren't any hard and fast rules but it seems like a scandal that received national scandal only for a short time and has been forgotten. mirageinred 04:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:N with the various sources stated in the article. Twenty Years 06:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but rename I think it should be Cunt: The Movie or something that doesn't sound like a news article. But it is notable