User talk:ThinkBlue

Archives

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

RE: PPV

I believe we should work on either Vengeance (2004) or Taboo Tuesday (2005). What do you think? BTW, thanks for supporting me in my RfA. Cheers, L A X 16:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. ;) Cheers, L A X 16:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, not really. I think I nailed 'em. Cheers, L A X 16:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I would have somehow incorporated that into my answer for question three, but the discussion started after I had already answered the question. IMO, he should never be unblocked. Cheers, L A X 16:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Cheers, L A X 16:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, they don't seem to be communicating all that much. Cheers, L A X 17:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'm a little pre-occupied with Survivor Series (2003). I will probably start WrestleMania XX at the weekend when I have a little bit more free time! Can I also note that I live in the UK, and am five hours ahead of America (its 5pm here now) D.M.N. (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, maybe. Cheers, L A X 17:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to ask Trucco and iMatthew why they haven't started yet. When I've finished SS 03, and if they still haven't started, I'll shift gears and head to WMXX. Oh, and I know it's not my fault I'm ahead of you. BTW, which part of America do you live? Have you ever been to WWE event. Unfortuantely for me I haven't. :( D.M.N. (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I don't really boo Cena, but until a few days ago, he was one of my favourites. Something a little off topic, but you'll see why it's relevent in a few lines. A few days ago, my favourite football (soccer in America) team in England, Arsenal faced Tottenham in a big Cup match. Unfortunately for me, Arsenal lost 5-1, thus going out the cup. So, when I go on the internet, and see this picture of Cena in a Tottenham soccer shirt pissed me off even more. Oh well. BTW, your doing a great job. Could you possibly trim through Survivor Series (2003) when you have a moment and see if there are any typos or glaring errors that stand out? Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 17:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT (sarcasm). Who expected that? Anyway yeah maybe, we'll go onto SS '06. D.M.N. (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcasm for Cena. D.M.N. (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For Unforgiven: 1) Remove some of the pictures. 2) Copy-edit the "Event" section, it is too long in my opinion. D.M.N. (talk) 18:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep it's still long, you need to cut it down so it's like in a summary style, for instance so its as short as it is in Survivor Series (2002). D.M.N. (talk) 19:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still feel it's a little too long. I'd prefer the section to look like this in a way. You just seem to of gone into too much detail that probably isn't needed. In my view, it would still be able to achieve GA (if you're looking for that) if you cut it down more. D.M.N. (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it should. I'll be carrying it on tomorrow (as I'm just about to watch SD! off YouTube). D.M.N. (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I have some of it saved in my sandbox. Cheers, L A X 18:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great idea. Cheers, L A X 18:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to sound like a dick, but It's going great. I currently have 27 supports, 5 of which are from admins, 0 opposes, and 0 neutrals. Cheers, L A X 18:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ;). Yes please, I probably won't be on (editing anyway) for the next couple of days, so don't expect the background section done anytime soon. Sorry :( Cheers, L A X 18:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Well, I have to get goin' now. Talk to ya later. Cheers, L A X 19:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?? Line for Line? D.M.N. (talk) 19:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better. I noticed you added the HEAT match for Survivor Series (2003). You'll probably be able to guess what my next question is.... could you possibly carry on with the Event section; and I continue with the Background? D.M.N. (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't think you need to do anything more with Unforgiven (2005). Some people tend to frown upon one person having 2 noms up on the GAN page at once, so when Unforgiven (2004) is passed (or failed), then nominate '05. Cheers, D.M.N. (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What one? Cheers, L A X 01:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Cheers, L A X 01:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll help with whatever I can on the event, and I'll do the aftermath as the weeks go by. Cheers, L A X 01:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afterwards, will we work on Armageddon? Cheers, L A X 01:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I never got the chance to. Yes, please update the PPV list ;). Cheers, L A X 01:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the HD info. Cheers, L A X 01:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid. Although I like and respect Cena, I don't feel he should have won the Royal Rumble. What do you think? Cheers, L A X 01:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should just cover the Michaels/HHH and Rock/Lesnar feuds. BTW, sorry for not completing the background, I've been really busy lately. Cheers, L A X 02:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine ;). I don't know exactly, you'll have to do some reading. Sorry :(. Cheers, L A X 02:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both, but quit reverting on NWO. It was just announced on RAW (for me anyway). Cheers, L A X 02:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Cheers, L A X 02:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and the participants for the Elimination Chamber were just announced. Cheers, L A X 02:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RAW. Cheers, L A X 02:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought all you wanted to know was the brand? Cheers, L A X 02:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's do determine the #1 contender to the WWE Championship at WrestleMania. Cheers, L A X 02:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it's already up on No Way Out (2008) and Elimination Chamber. Cheers, L A X 02:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A certain who? Cheers, L A X 02:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Yes it should. Cheers, L A X 03:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd wait until at least next week. Cheers, L A X 03:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't. Cheers, L A X 03:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Well, at least it's semi-protected now. Cheers, L A X 03:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Until February 19, and not only will WrestleMania be a target, but so will No Way Out. Cheers, L A X 03:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably. You? Cheers, L A X 03:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When does (Wikipedia time) Raw come on for you? Cheers, L A X 03:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. So, you goin' to No Way Out? Cheers, L A X 03:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, some friend you've got. lol. Cheers, L A X 03:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sucks. Cheers, L A X 03:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should, even though I think Hardy's prime to win. Cheers, L A X 03:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry, I've said too much. Cheers, L A X 03:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Cheers, L A X 03:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. Cheers, L A X 03:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even over your man? Cheers, L A X 04:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. Cheers, L A X 04:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say stupidest, but definitely one of the stupidest. Cheers, L A X 04:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought, but I was going to let someone else revert. Cheers, L A X 04:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After Armageddon, and Taboo Tuesday. I was thinking about a Backlash. What would you want to work on next? Cheers, L A X 23:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I linked right to it, 2004. Cheers, L A X 23:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you're a busy woman. Cheers, L A X 23:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not as much as I would like to on PPVs, but I work a ton on reverting vandalism. Cheers, L A X 23:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot. When, after Taboo Tuesday? Cheers, L A X 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, he does this with EVERY pay-per-view article he creates (see: here, here, and here). Cheers, L A X 23:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. He clearly needs to familiarize himself with our guidelines. Cheers, L A X 23:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind, that would probably be better anyways. Cheers, L A X 00:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take the background, you can have the event, and we'll both work on the aftermath. Thoughts? Cheers, L A X 00:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow at 19:43 (UTC). Cheers, L A X 00:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

43 supports, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral. Cheers, L A X 00:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, as that is 98% percent of the votes for support (not to sound like a dick or anything). Cheers, L A X 00:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPV wise or in general. Cheers, L A X 00:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPV wise, nothing (even though I should be), and In general, reverting any vandalism I see. Cheers, L A X 00:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I think that they were just supposed be there until the PPV aired. Cheers, L A X 01:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of listing the qualifying matches, I think that we should just make note that "Royal Rumble qualifying matches took place to determine a few of the rumble participants." iMatthew 01:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 2008 pay-per-views I would like to work on would be: Backlash, SummerSlam, and Survivor Series. Thoughts? Cheers, L A X 01:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cool. Two things: I see you and LAX are working on Armageddon, is that just you two, or may I help? Also, may I start a new thread here (this one is getting long) lol iMatthew 01:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you also see this. :| D.M.N. (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly do the Aftermath - is that OK? I'll finish off the Background section by at least the weekend :] D.M.N. (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiForce SmashBros's First GA!!!

Ssbm is our first GA!!!!!--Smashbrosboy (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was not just me. A group of editors did this. By the time I got the Task Force up, the article had already gone for GA nomination.--Smashbrosboy (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Thank you for making a report about User:JeffHardyChampion (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! You only warned this editor once, not enough for a submittal to WP:AIV. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 04:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if he continues to vandalize articles at a pace that you can't keep up with him, after you've already warned him, you can always use {{subst:uw-bv}} to warn the editor. Does this answer your question? Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 04:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :)

For the birthday wishes! Although since I'm in the Pacific time zone, it's not technically my birthday for another hour and a half. :p No worries Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 06:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blue, my LA dodgers fan, you is a genius!

Blue! Long time no see! Ok, it's only been 6 days, but I justed wanted to thank you for the help on the Starrcade 97 article. That was very cool. But, instead of resting on laurels and past accomplishments, what do you say we create more articles, like starrcade 98, and 99. My ogal is to be huge on WCW article making, so, yeah. Expect this site to be LITTERED with WCW PPV articles. Oh, and are you going to get to see the Royal Rumlbe tonight? EWC Champion (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it Be Cool..

If for the WrestleMania week edition of the newsletter, the member interviews were "The Kliq", and "The WP:PW Cabal". lol. =] iMatthew 13:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kliq

What's the Kliq? Sexy Sea Shark 17:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are We Done?

with SummerSlam? If we are, maybe you and LAX could help us finish WM XX. Then we can pick new projects. iMatthew 23:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Btw, Sorry I haven't been helping with much lately. I've just be really really busy with school, and haven't have more than 10 minutes a day to help out. iMatthew 23:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It will be some day, but not now. I'm only 13. iMatthew 23:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Have you seen younger editors before? (like 8,9, or 10) iMatthew 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that it crazy. By the way, I'm going to start looking into the Aftermath and Background sections of PPV articles. I have no problem writing the event sections, but I'm not good at writing the other two. (background, aftermath). Until I fully learn how to write a fully developed background, aftermath section (which will hopefully be soon), I'm going to stick to writing the event sections. I think I'll sit down this weekend and try to work on that. Also, the WP:PW members list currently has over 300 members on it. Some of those members haven't made an edit since mid-2007. If that is the case, and there is no notification of a Wikibeak, can their name be removed from the list. I find it funny that of a list of 300+ members, there are only 15-20 that actually participate. iMatthew 00:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPV's (2)

I understand Truco's point, but I am going to finish my part of WM XX, and SummerSlam 02 by tomorrow or Thursday. Then, I'll have Royal Rumble as my main focus. Also, I was just wondering if Armageddon was a "Kliq" project or just you and LAX. I'll see if I can help after I finish WMXX and SS02. iMatthew 01:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I started working on WMXX, also I've been finishing List of The New Detectives episodes, but I've been busy trying to get the situation in the WWE Roster fixed up...(adding citations/tables)...why?--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 01:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, lol...buh yeah busy wit alot of stuff, u going to NWO 08?--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you do you can easily write the event section of the article...--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep...can you believe Cena is back?--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was in shock he came back, you know WWE lied, he was only going to be out for like 4 months, WWE just overexagerated to keep it a secret. It was ok for him to come back, but winning was BS, Kane/Triple H should have won.TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to do this, but I going to abandon the background section for SummerSlam. Maybe I finish it some time, but right now, I would like to work on Armageddon. BTW, please start a new thread on my talk page. Cheers, L A X 20:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can work on it in your sandbox if you'd like. Cheers, L A X 20:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Congrats

Thank you very much. I'll probably send out a detailed thank you tomorrow. Cheers, L A X 20:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]