Template:RFCreli list
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
- Template:RFCreli There are many articles on religion that do not mention the fact that there is no scientific evidence for the things being discussed. Should a template be added to all such articles, stating this fact? To discuss these issues without giving the alternative view appears to be entirely against NPOV.
- Talk:Osho POV conflict, allegations of biased sourcing, lack of clarity of what sources to use and how, edit war
- Talk:Paul Tillich Comments requested on style and content of theological sections
- Talk:List of converts to Judaism The inclusion of many people in this list is disputed based on notability guidelines.
- Talk:Jehovah can we get consensus on the "See Also" to avert vandalism??
- Template talk:Books of the Bible There is a dispute about the scope of this template: should it include Christian and Jewish canonical traditions together or not? Does this constitute a problem of POV or original research?
- Talk:New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures Including information on names of translators is disputed
- Talk:Nontrinitarianism This impedance of improvement of the Nontrinitarian article by Trinitarians is getting harmful: Nontrinitarinism is a POV and you can't exlude those POVs or you would have no article.
- Talk:Makara Jyothi Inviting a third person to verify it again and possible removal of all three tags placed
For more information, see User:RFC bot