If you leave a message in my talk page, I may leave replies here as well but not necessarily in your talk page.--Jusjih 17:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Planohamites.jpg

Hello. Why was this deleted? As I indicated, it was self-made, and I re-uploaded it saying what the copyright status was (creative commons I think). Cheers, Neale Monks 19:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any Creative Commons licensing, so your self-made claim would still be insufficient, but I am undeleting it to give you seven days to tag it properly. Once properly tagged, it can be restored in the relevant article again. Thank you for your cooperation.--Jusjih 01:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Image

Hello! You have deleted logo in Sankukai, and now my question is how can I add image(logo) so it would not be deleted?

On 29 September 2007, BetacommandBot tagged it invalid rationale. On 5 October 2007, you simply removed non-free logo tag and then blanked the page, so I considered you pleading no contest to BetacommandBot's action and deleted the logo. Since you ask now, I have undeleted the logo to allow you 7 days to add fair use rationale. If you have questions, please feel free to ask.--Jusjih 01:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I would change that for the first time, but I was searching how to change that. So I added some line that this is free logo and then deleted what bot added. But I guess that is not the way. What shall I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zigam (talk • contribs) 14:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly did you get that logo? Please specify the source before I can think of some rationales for you.--Jusjih 01:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its official Sankukai logo, It's the same if I would make one myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.255.193.250 (talk) 11:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was it from a website?--Jusjih 15:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image help

You recently deleted the image for Maryland politician Jeannie Haddaway because it did not meet the guidelines, which I agree. I contacted Jeannie Haddaway this week and asked if she could send me an image that I could use to post on Wikipedia. She sent one to me. However, I've read the Licensing options and I'm confused. What is the proper way to tag the image since it's not my own work, but I have permission to use it? The option that I would assume is correct (The copyright holder gave me permission to use this work only in Wikipedia articles (no other terms specified)), gives an ominous message. It seems to be tagging it for speedy deletion. Am I doing something wrong or do I have more work to do? Your assistance is appreciated.Wallstreethotrod 01:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot accept images with permission for Wikipedia only if no fair use rationale. Unless you do talk about a specific image, you cannot practically claim fair use on living people's photographs to solely show their appearances.--Jusjih 02:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image speedy deletion - PRO_test

Yesterday you tagged and speedily-deleted an image I uploaded probably over 18 months ago. I don't think speedy deletion is appropriate in such a situation where the uploader cannot reasonably expected to review the image and correct any problems - the main issue being the time of the upload. This means that you cannot expect the uploader to remember the specifics of the image, and that it may have been uploaded when rules deemed it appropriate.

In this case I think a more appropriate tag and reason for deletion is that it is not in use, not has it been for a while. I write this as your message confused me - I didn't remember the image, your templated message seems quite similar to a warning(!), and is not at all specific to the file. Maybe a better catch-all message could be written to stop this, especially in cases of long-forgotten images.

Thanks, |→ Spaully^₪† 23:36, 1 November 2007 (GMT)

Unfortunately your upload licensed under non-derivative license is unacceptable here without fair use rationale. Maxim actually deleted it while supporting my tagging. Please tell me any relevant article to claim fair use, so I can undelete to give you another chance.--Jusjih 02:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lorelei7 images

Regarding this image debate: I wanted to let you know I went ahead and deleted all of the images due to their questionable copyright status. Let me know if you hear anything from the copyright holder, and even if you don't, thanks for taking that initiative, anyway. -- RG² 12:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Japon timbre.jpg

NOT WORTH THE BOTHER. It is not obvious where to write this explanation for my annoyance. Nor is it obvious where to write the "rationale" for use of an image.

The bottom line is that the rationale was included initially; and it is not clear how to edit this image description page in a way that avoids future problems. Why should I struggle with this problem for more than an hour?

Your work is unhelpful because the complaint announcement does not include adequate information about how to address or resolve the issue you raise -- and in this specific case, I now resent the implied urgency which requires me to accommodate myself to YOUR random agenda and time-frame without knowing who you are or why.

In short, what you are doing seems to becomes somewhat irresponsible in the context your actions create; and this continues to be an appropriate and timely criticism no matter how valid your intentions may be. Not a good thing. --Ooperhoofd 17:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My action is to enforce the policy here, no agenda. The copyright rule here is a policy, not merely a suggestion.--Jusjih 01:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Err?

I don't know to what you're referring. All I did was remove a nonsense phrase ("Go Mariemont Warriors!") in the renewable energy page. I felt it was inappropriate and don't see how removing nonsense is vandalism. All the other garbage there, I didn't fix because I didn't know how, or what the standard was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.1.96 (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For a super awesome effort (calling twice and emailing) in trying to clarify the license of the Lorelei7 images. hbdragon88 05:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your award. I will try calling +1 818 832 1101 tomorrow to see if I can speak with her briefly to get her attention. You are concerned of the licensing statement and I am concerned of whether that uploader is truly Lorelei. I have tried to vote to keep these eight images due to educational and informational values. If I can get her attention to explain licensing statements, I hope to undelete and then send these images to Commons.--Jusjih 02:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Again, kudos to you for going way beond the call of duty for making 100% certain that these images were indeed uploaded by Loreleli and arelicensed under the GFDL. Withour your backing they would have been quietly deleted and the bondage articles lacking in image quality. hbdragon88 (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I'm not sure what I want to specialize in. I declared Special:Newpages and CAT:CSD interest in my RfA, and the logs show just that – some 80 entries within the first 12 hours of being an admin (a few PROD and three November 18 IFD entries). I haven't done image work in a long time, but I used to like it – I found howcheng's script so useful that I recommended it to Nv8200p, Gay Cdn, and Fritz Saalfeld. I also did a few big nominations while culling through orphaned/unencylopedic Category:GFDL images. hbdragon88 08:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SkyTran_Seattle2.jpg

The copywrite status is on that page, very clearly. Please look at these type of things before you label them as without copywrite information. Fresheneesz 03:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. What exactly is the license? "This picture has permission to be used by wikipedia: "I can send them a permission form if they need/want something like that. Doug Malewicki" What kind of permission is that? GFDL? CC? PD? Per Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia, please send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation. Failure to do so may still result in deletion if your claimed permission is questionable.--Jusjih 03:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, the copywrite status IS very clear on the page. Its copywrited by Unimodal. You don't need to be such a dick about this. I'll tell the owner of the picture to send an email there. Quit adding inappropriate tags. Fresheneesz 19:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am reporting your uncooperative attitude to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Image:SkyTran_Seattle2.jpg_and_its_uploader_Fresheneesz. Removing the no-license tag without a proper tag does not help.--Jusjih 02:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I note that your attitude is also uncooperative. You're being a self-rightious idiot about something so trivial. The no-license tag says "This image or media does not have information on its copyright status." It is the third time i'm telling you that that sentence is 100% false. Take some good advice and pull that stick out of your ass. The owner of that picture has emailed permissions-en as of Nov 9, 2007 9:11 PM. I hope I never see you again. Should I remove the tag again, or do you want to do it this time? Fresheneesz 06:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image for consideration

You might want to have a look at this. I'm no expert on images, but I have a hard time believing that a derivitive work incorporating a picture of Christoper Walken can correctly be GFDL without source of the original photo that was reworked here.--Isotope23 ^talk 19:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. While it can be tagged no source despite GFDL claim, I decide to post to possibly unfree images to request discussion while there are considerable uses.--Jusjih 01:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Water st terminal.JPG

Image:Water st terminal.JPG was tagged "This image or media has no source information." Yige has uploaded other images, and this appears to be his own. He hasn't been on the side for more than a year. Would it be possible to use one of the copyright tags from another one of his images to this one? vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 04:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was also tagged no source on 23 May 2006 but the uploader simply added a license tag without specifying the source. If you think in good faith that s/he have made it, I suggest that you write in your thought when removing my tag, but better not tag it GFDL-self until confirmed.--Jusjih 04:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not move images to commons, I never have, and had no plans for this one. This image will be replaced when I get a new digital camera in the near future. I currently cannot replace it and have had trouble finding anyone willing to do so. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vietidol.jpg

Please do not delete a picture without permission!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.66.165 (talk • contribs)

That was never tagged. Your appeal is hereby denied.--Jusjih (talk) 20:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HNTTMM IMAGE

This is regarding the HNTTMM image u have tagged....MAHALO for letting me know that....but the image was complete created by me...how do i specify that? I don't know how...but it was created by me....if you could help mt i would be very apperciated.Jaziale (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

copyright tag added

I just added a copyright tag to the image: San Carlos, Sonora, México .jpg Thanks for noticing that the tag was missing, and thanks also for the valuable job you do in wikipedia.

Sincerely, Victor de Lafuente. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vhlafuente (talk • contribs) 07:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YTV 2004 PM.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:YTV 2004 PM.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YTV 2005.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:YTV 2005.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly Unfree image: Plates.jpg

Please DO delete this image. I thought I had gotten the proper permission to use it and another of Alexander Bedford from the owner of the website on which it appeared, but it turned out that he withdrew that permission (understandably) because he could not agree to the Wikipedia GNU free usage terms. I'm pretty new here, so I wasn't sure how to do it; if you can, please do so. Thanks! - Ecjmartin (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby acknowledge your message, but I prefer to leave the deletion to another disinterested admin who can check OTRS. I have no access.--Jusjih (talk) 02:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question!

Hey, just wondering something, you put an note saying I didn't have a copyright source or whatever, the picture I took was for an article I had written but now got merged, so feel free to delete right away.

By the way, I got a question! If I wanted to delete something I had uploaded, how would I do that?? Please answer on my talk page. THX!Warrior4321 03:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your copyright message on User_talk:Nigelpwsmith

Hi, I believe that you're correct in saying that there is a copyright infringement [1]. The image has been deleted before for that reason. It looks like it's been scanned from the annual report, contradicting the editors assertion that he owns the copyright. He has also asserted copyright to the text he has copied and pasted from an action group website, see Talk:Langbar_International The editor doesn't appear to have respect for WP guidelines such as WP:COI & WP:COPYRIGHT and appears to be saying whatever is necessary to give the impression of compliance. He appears to be editing on a single issue. His editing makes it difficult to check the facts on some controversial issues, see User_talk:Nigelpwsmith#Your_recent_edits. I'm now frustrated and would like the whole way he's gone about editing escalated, but don't know which mechanism to use. I raised it here Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2007_November_20/Articles but received no help. Please could you, as an admin escalate it. Thanks -- John (Daytona2 · talk) 13:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I am asking that problem user at Talk:Langbar International to email permissions-en at wikimedia dot org per Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia to prove the copyright ownership. Otherwise, we cannot be sure if s/he is who s/he say that s/he is.--Jusjih 19:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I have also asked them to do the same for the copied article text. It has no GDFU? licence and copyright is owned by the company, according to the credit on the copied article, so User:Nigelpwsmith needs to prove the company is wrong, unless WP is lax enough to accept somebodies word ? -- John (Daytona2 · talk) 21:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kokopelli images

I posted those some time ago and then removed them when the owner of the property that they were on asked me to. I believe that they are now orphan images, and so yes, please get them as out of the system as is possible. Carptrash 02:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image:scoobysnap

Hello, I tried to contact the owner of the image but they gave me a fax number witch I don't have anymore. Plus I don't have a Fax machine so here is the email address I used to ask tcncopyrightagent@turner.com

For copyright inquiries under the DMCA please contact: The Cartoon Network, Inc. Attn: Valarie Sewer, Copyright Agent - TEG Legal Dept. 1050 Techwood Drive NW Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 885-0620 Fax: (404) 885-0600

Thanks

--Wolfdog1 (talk) 02:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not expect the company to license it under GFDL while commercial use is not forbidden. As I have many other things I cannot bother. If you can email and get any response, please forward to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org as evidence.--Jusjih (talk) 02:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nadine_Conner.jpg)

Yes - Remove it please.
NewYork1956 (talk) 00:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Jusjih (talk) 01:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That woman in the image looked like singer Nadine Conner, but she was actually another singer named Nadine. For future reference, how can I have images deleted myself? Thanks again.
NewYork1956 (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an administrator here, so you cannot delete images, but you may tag {{ifd}} or ask any administrator if you have a good reason. If you are interested, you may apply yourself to become an administrator, subject to community evaluation.--Jusjih 01:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roseate Spoonbill

The image was uploaded in good faith from http://www.pics4learning.com. If that is no longer acceptable, delete away. Jimfbleak (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mattbaby.jpg

You deleted a family photo that is only used on MY user page. You are trigger-happy with the delete button. This is the first time I have logged in in a few weeks, and I see that it is deleted without my even having had a chance to correct the tag on it. I no longer have access to the file on my computer; please reinstate the photo so that I can put the proper tag on it. Ztrawhcs (talk) 05:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Uncivil talks by Despres)

This section is deleted as uncivil and threatening messages by Despres. Please check the page history to see them.--Jusjih (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tomken Road Middle School

I did give a source!! "I RECORDED IT MYSELF" ,it's a talking article i can't really steal it from anywhere else —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrior4321 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me,I didn't shout, I just copy pasted the line from the audio file, I would have written the whole thing in Caps Lock. Why would I scream at you?? You're just an admin doing his job. Warrior4321 02:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

There is that good now?? Warrior4321 03:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

No Problem, & THANK YOU for helping Wikipedia be a better place! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrior4321 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Year page formatting of multiple events

Hello, I'm sending you this message since you were involved in the August 2005 survey on year pages. As I don't know if you've gathered, somebody has been fighting for a change to the house style on how to notate multiple events on the same date. A discussion is currently in progress - your contribution would be appreciated! -- Smjg (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I am coming.--Jusjih (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sophia.jpg

Look again there is a lot of information about its status. Its licensed explicitly to wikipedia and to me. jbolden1517^Talk 18:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ShehoriNYC2CD.jpg

Hi. I have permission to use this image from Cembal d'amour. In order to confirm this, you may wish to visit www.cembaldamour.com. Their contact e-mail address is listed: support at cembaldamour dot com - so send them an e-mail and they will confirm that the images on wikipedia page for 'Mordecai Shehori' appear with their blessing. This also applies for the other image that you disputed - Mordecai_Shehori.1.jpg

Thanks Cvxmelody 01:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mirza19nov1954.jpg‎

Hey dude I dont mind deleting this. HumayunMirzaJR (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Image copyright problem with Image:M&LKlogo2.jpg

Dear Jusjih,

The Image M&LKlogo2 isn't copyrighted.

Masterchief46517 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi again. I've got a couple of images that are giving me too much grief that I don't want to deal with anymore. They will be deleted in time anyways, but if you could simply remove the following two images it would be greatly appreciated.
- Image:SarahPalin.jpg
- Image:ElisabethSchwarzkopf.jpeg
Thank you.
NewYork1956 (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tribrachidium

Because it's not Tribrachidium, it's an Edrioasteroid. A more suitably cropped version of the image is available elsewhere.

Thanks,

Verisimilus T 11:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Edrioasteroid.pngVerisimilus T 10:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oast7

Thenks for alerting me to the fact that the licence wasn't showing. I had ended the licence with ]] instead of }}! You would have seen this when you put the no licence notification on the picture and could have corrected this yourself - or is that against the rules? I have corrected the wikitext so everything should be OK now. Mjroots (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Geograph website. All images there are able to be used in Wikipedia. Mjroots (talk) 08:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Possibly unfree Image:Azathar_pic..jpg

Thanks for letting me know about this.--C.J. (talk • contribs) 06:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Possibly unfree Image:MissLakeman.gif

This picture was given to me in person by the copyright holder specifically for the purpose of putting it on Wikipedia. He says he is happy for it to be in the public domain and I have tagged it accordingly. I don't understand what your problem is. Woblosch (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted photos which were listed as public domain, which I took

For some reason, you deleted quite a few of the photos I have add to Wikipedia. I took all of the photos. I also listed all of them as public domain using the appropriate link provided in the Wikipedia upload file page.

== Why did you do this? ==

Phil Konstantin

Image copyright problem with Image:Jubileedancer.jpg Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jubileedancer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:TommyLasorda.jpg Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:TommyLasorda.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:SteveGarvey.jpg Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SteveGarvey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:RichieHavens.jpg Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:RichieHavens.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:RalphRubio.jpg Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:RalphRubio.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Philkon" Views

Thank you in advance for your assistance. The PD claim for Image:Jon_Lucien has been removed. I believe that required Fair Use clarification is now in place, and in compliance. Please notify me of any additional attention needed.Tonymartin (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just cos

Nengscoz416 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

help please with image

Hello, Not sure i'm doing this right. You've picked one of my photos for deletion. What must I do to stop the deletion? I'm new to Wiki, so please no jargon! The image is Remedial_works.jpg. It's a photograph I took myself on 35mm film in 1987 and scanned in. I thought I had categorised it correctly. thanks --Wikipeebee (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Internationale in Chinese

Hello Jusjih! Thanks for letting me know about the possibility of splitting the Chinese section of The Internationale. I was against the attempt to include Bengali lyrics in the main article because there was no information that the Bengali version played a significant role in the global history of the song. Furthermore, the section looked a lot like graffiti - although I didn't quite say this - because it did not include any historical information at all. With the Chinese version, the situation is obviously different. As I said in my prior comments, to my knowledge, the French and the Russian versions are the most important historically, and the English version is included because it is the English Wikipedia. The Internationale in Chinese obviously played an important role too, and since I don't know enough about the history, I didn't have a preference either way. However, since the article is long and you have more material to put in, splitting the section may be a good idea.

I think the proposed merger of The Internationale in Indian Languages into The Internationale is unrealistic. If you take a look at the edit history of the Internationale article a few years ago, you'll see that it included texts of many versions of the song, which then got moved to Wikisource. If the text and the history of the Bengali version were included in the Wikipedia article, than why not Spanish? Tagalog? German? Serbo-Croatian? - in the end, it would be a similar situation as before, and the article would be exceedingly long. So, in my opinion, if you think splitting the Chinese section into a separate article is a good idea, you can go ahead without waiting for the Indian merger to be resolved. In fact, a separate Chinese article may help the merger issue disappear.

Miranche (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jusjih! I completely agree with your decision. Miranche (talk) 06:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image License

Sorry. Thanks for fixing. Tyrenius (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Funny_Foto.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Funny_Foto.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you delete / remove this photo for me? I tried, but I have no idea how to do so. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I have deleted it per your request. Only administrators can delete pages.--Jusjih (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Me 3.jpg

I wish you would stop making me out as a vandaliser. I uploaded that image first, and that image has me IN it. So stop reverting it back to what some else has written in the image description, as it's about me, not somebody else. And in my opinion, that image name is fine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammy0002 (talk • contribs) 09:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Possibly unfree Image:1954-lowres-JAJ-daily-mail-pangboche-scalp-+hand.jpg

I have been away for a very long time, so apologies. John Angelo Jackson was my father, since his passing in 2005 (North Wales) I came into possession of his rather vast photographic library. He took the picture of the scalp and hand whilst on the Daily Mail Snowman Expedition in 1954. He was one of the few avid photographers on expeditions of that time. I initially scanned the picture from my father's book "Adventure Travels in the Himalaya" (2005), and did the work on the JAJ entry on Wikipedia. I since have all the original slides. Maybe you can suggest what the next move is, I was prepared to donate the picture too whom ever wanted the current degraded state I provided it. Later expeditions had to pay to view the pieces, and so their significance has diminished, as I explain in detail on the Yeti page. I own and have in my possession the photograph. (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Gabby and Alyssa

This is all my work. I took it at a field trip in Boston. If you want to delete it, you can, but I am just clearing things up a bit. -- Carerra^{"I love Lancers!} 14:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=Image:David_Faber_and_I2006.JPG

How can I add copyright info, sir? —Preceding unsigned comment added by VHPalex (talk • contribs) 22:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]