User talk:Betacommand

If you are here to register a complaint regarding my edits, before doing so please note:

There is a very clear policy regarding the use of non-free images. This policy is located at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria
Read this talk page and its archives before registering your complaint. It is likely someone has already registered a similar complaint, and that complaint will have been given an answer.
Read the policy
Check and make sure the image has a valid source
Make sure that the image has a valid Fair use Rationale (A guide can be found here)
I will not add rationales for you. As the uploader it is your responsibility, NOT mine.
I do not want to see images deleted
All images must comply with policy
A generic template tag is NOT a valid fair use rationale.
If you're here to whine and complain that But <place image name here> is just like my image and isn't tagged for deletion I will tag that image too, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

		The Original Barnstar
		Because of your repeated kindness and willingness to help others when nobody else will even know about it, I sincerely thank you. You've helped me build an army of... well, I'll just leave it there. :-D east.718 at 01:16, December 16, 2007

James Amann

Removing criticism from a politician's article leads one to believe there's an agenda here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.78 (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2008 01:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your absurd warning

is indeed a personal attack. I do no wish my name to be shown without my permission. I removed my name and you label it vandalism. I request you to revert yourself with apology.--Caspian blue (talk) 03:40, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you have zero grounds for editing statistics within my userspace, a previous MfD has proven that users cannot censor those statistics, dont like it? tough. its no way a personal attack. β^_command 03:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to publish my name without my permission. I also put my name on the list of who do not want to be published. Besides, the rightful removal is NOT vandalism. You rather tainted my talk pge with false accusation. You've warned for such disruptive behavior. Well, I think this is the suitable time going around for WP:MfD.--Caspian blue (talk)

you might want to read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Betacommand/Edit count Ive been there done that, you have no right to censor statistics. β^_command 03:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a right to request my name not to be published. You refuse to remove my name. Besides, consensus is changing all the time, so well will see how this time goes.--Caspian blue (talk) 03:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No you don't caspian. As I said below, it is not private information, and is already accessible to anybody. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is a public information, I do not want my name to be there, and Beta could've blanked it without such the rude attitude.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to remove your name. Its not a privacy issue, as you state, considering anybody can get the information. You chose to edit Wikipedia, and release your contributions and user info (username) under a free license. Nobody made you. And such a simple thing such as your edit count, well, thats just okay information to have anywhere. It's just a number. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caspian, its public information. The last MFD resulted in a keep, and any future ones would probably result in a keep as well. Its best to just drop the issue. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]