User talk:Nar Matteru

Please Note: If you ask a question here, I will go to your talk page to respond, unless you request otherwise.

Calley Page

Hey Nar. If you go for arbitration on the Calley article, please give me a heads up. Thanks. Equinox137 (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas 2

Oops. Posted in the wrong section. I moved this to your user page.

ellens page

i know of several instances on wikipedia where scanned images are used as references, and have never been challenged by other editors. i'm not saying you are wrong, but i would like you to point me to (link me to) the documentation which says that such practise is invalid. 142.68.83.23 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars! :-)

Don't worry about it, mate! We all make mistakes. And of course, I'm glad that there are still good-hearted users around here at Wikipedia. :-) Neil the Cellist (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mancow Muller

I'm sorry about the undocumented edit I made to the Mancow Muller page. I've added sources this time including the actual audio from the Fox TV News interview Mancow gave on June 2, 2008. I hope those are acceptable.MMISANUT (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zophar's Domain: New ZD Management Failings

I simply am trying to figure out this "bias" statement that you have made about my perspective. Who am I being biased towards in that section?

That new section to that article clearly stated only facts and lacked "bias". I was not defending anyone in that section. It is not my fault that some users appeared under negative light in that section, but then I did not put my own statements/words of bias in that section. If I had other resources to somehow defend them I would have, but then it actually happend that way.

Now maybe my comments seemed bias, but then I don't see anyone actually challengeing that by putting some action into it. Unless this immediate reaction of undo is supposedly a sign of that, in which case that sure doesn't solve anything. Since facts are not being challenged, instead bias is somehow being challenged. EMU-LMAO (talk) 23:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Neil the Cellist

YES! That's me. I'm so glad you liked my news posting. It has generated over a quarter million views and has spawned almost half a million (~500,000) hits on Google.

I even made it to The Register, which is one of the mainstream news sources in Britain. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/18/ubisoft_pirates_fix_from_pirates/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilthecellist (talk • contribs) 18:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHOA sorry for not signing my previous post. I see a bot has done it for me. Neil the Cellist (talk) 04:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email me when you get a chance. neilthecellist@gmail.com . Thanks. Neil the Cellist (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Coy article

Why did you remove my contribution? What do you mean it was too long? I've read longer sections on different pages. I'm kind of confused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Countacolor (talk • contribs) 09:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the information is informative and interesting, then why does it matter? Not only that, but I always thought encyclopedias were suppose to contain a lot of information about someone. Countacolor (talk) 20:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I posted it because there is a lot of controversy surrounding the case. It was a high profile case in Texas. Many people believe he was wrongfully convicted and vice versa. I thought I could put things in perspective. It also took a lot of time to write all that up, and the information does pertain to him. Would it be better if I made a whole new page for it? Countacolor (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a picture of Bob Guccione

The picture you keep posting of Bob Guccione is not him. It may be a picture of another Bob Guccione, but certainly not the one referenced in this Wikipedia biography. Here is a picture of Bob Guccione from a reputable source, New York Magazine, in 2004 and as you can see there is no resemblance: http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/n_9815/ Here are more pics: http://www.planetvictoria.com/guccionegirls.jpg, http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/article/files/Deeds-BobGuccione1V.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.observer.com/2007/bob-guccione-never-heard-him-you-re-milbank-mansion&h=374&w=250&sz=21&hl=en&start=1&sig2=fMtyc2lw29y4BwrOabmhnw&um=1&usg=__FbVRW18t7YKImI38pexIbLGtRqI=&tbnid=5NngudIZcAincM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=82&ei=rx63SNDwK6KSee_KsZwD&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbob%2Bguccione%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artista32 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC) --Artista32 (talk) 22:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]