User talk:Gunnar Hendrich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gunnar Hendrich (talk | contribs) at 15:18, 2 September 2008 (restore chronological order). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WP AH

This user wants you to join
WikiProject
Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Every good edit counts so thanks for your work. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nii Tackie Tawiah III

Please be more careful with speedy deletion tagging, and make sure you're familiar with the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for deletion. This tagging was way over the line separating "honest mistake" from "blatant abuse" – I find it hard to imagine a more obvious assertion of notability than "He is the current king". – iridescent 17:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanks to the revert to the talk page! This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions

Kommentar auf de-wp

Du hast eine Antwort dort. Gruß, --buecherwuermlein talk here, please 20:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pink's fifth studio album

I'm not sure why you decided that this album fell under the criteria for deletion. No, it doesn't have a name yet, but it has an official release date and a single already on the airwaves. It's fine the way it is. 71.64.154.24 (talk) 20:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reference sources I deleted were links to the personal web pages of Pink, which, as you know, are not accepted as verifiable reference sources. 71.141.100.63 (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation on TMS page by Martin123

Hello, The majority of the section on 'attentional control' does not constitute rephrasing but is taken word-for-word from the article. In spite of the text being cited, this constitutes plagiarism. We ask that this section be modified to appropriately paraphrase the content of the article, or that the section be deleted. Further action will be sought to remove this material if it is not significantly revised or deleted. Thank you.Thedustbuster (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for wielding so swiftly the sword of WikiJustice, Gunnar. But not sure I'll try and be so "accurate" next time, or even bother, or needlessly hold my hands up after the event, following my telling off my The Anonymous Hoover. Anyone else is more than welcome to try and "rephrase" those concepts in their "own words". Martinevans123 (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Kristina barone worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TestEditBot (talk) 12:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert me

The List of people from Greater Manchester should be as it is (like List of people from London). I was reverting an editor who had copied and pasted the List of people from Manchester to that article which frankly, is wrong. Please be more careful. --Jza84 |  Talk  11:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Marshall Styler' listed for deletion

A page that you have been involved in editing, Marshall Styler, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  15:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

No problem! Cheers! J.delanoygabsadds 17:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weissmann

Hi, I see you have started cleaning up after Weissmann as well. Feel free to tag his strange redirects with {{db-r3}} for speedy deletion. I'm close to suggesting he be blocked for his disruptive behavior. Cheers Kevin (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar, there is no need to tag this article. It is important, I was a part of this. Do you know a little bit about this organization? Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the proper place to discuss the matter is the article's talk page. I have removed the PROD for now. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

campingkirche

Hi Gunnar, I would like to make a Wikipedia:NAC to Campingkirche with keep and change it to my proposed stub. You may rewrite or correct this, please. If there is an exsisting article (maybe Church service) where this could be a section, we can also redirect campingkirche and merge it. Will you please leave a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campingkirche. Your opinion is very appreciated. Thank you and schönes Wochenende. Sebastian scha. (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


And one Classical

Hey, you proposed my article for deletion. I just wanted to ask some questions, for one I don't understand why. Something about not having coverage in third-party sources. I would just like you to explain that so I can either edit it or remove my contesting. --Ouk (talk) 21:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Ouk[reply]


Fine I see your point. --Ouk (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Ouk[reply]

Anon vandal

He's causing major disruption. I've already asked him to stop, as did somebody before me. Can something be done? Gamer Junkie T / C 16:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. He's blocked. Gamer Junkie T / C 16:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About prod/speedy deletion/whatever

Yeah, I understand... I'm using Twinkle, so it automatically notifies you, but I probably should have just edited it manually once I read your last edit summary so it wouldn't show up. --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 17:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the tag just looks ugly. Regards, Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for reverting vandalism on my user page! Washburnmav (talk) 18:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to User:Washburnmav.

Hey,

Yes, I've been disruptive - however, my edits to User:Washburnmav and your own page have to be considered constructive.

I mean, its not like I deleted anything or added fabricated info - everything I put is true and provides its own proof.

156.34.187.139 (talk) 18:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm....

Well, at least you appreciate the irony ;-)

156.34.187.139 (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slow

You guys are slower than most...most days I can get banned in about 5 minutes or so.

Getting lazy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.187.139 (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest finding something better to do with your time? Washburnmav (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My first arv somehow did not make it to the board. Twinkle must have made a mistake. But your wish will be granted soon.Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was fuer ein dumpkopf eh Gunnar? Ich denke es gibts spassiger dinge zu tun. Washburnmav (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Allerdings. Just imagine WP if guys like him put their energy into actually improving it. Grüße, Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das waere schoen sein. Washburnmav (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Restore

Deletion review for Carpent tua poma nepotes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Carpent tua poma nepotes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Fednav Group

We are trying to edit our Company Page that someone else created without our permission and the edits are being reverted by you. How can I take control of this page?

Thanks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sysgen

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gunnar_Hendrich&oldid=235828655"