Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ovlem

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ThatsGrand (talk | contribs) at 21:59, 3 September 2008 (Undid revision 236112138 by ThatsGrand (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Ovlem

Suspected sock puppeteer

Ovlem (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppets

See also: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikipéire_(3rd)#User:Wikipéire (to avoid duplication)

Report submission by
Evidence
Comments
  • Please remember to notify all accounts listed as possibly linked to the sock puppetry in question (instructions).
    • Comment I was just looking at the odd patterns in this user's (Ovlem) edits when BenWBell opened this sock note. Even if not a sock, (although the evidence would suggest it is) the patterns of Ovlem's edits suggest at least issues with WP:SPA (user singularly removing all refs to "Republic of Ireland" and little else), and WP:STALK (focusing purely on reverting the edits of a single user). Guliolopez (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I can 100% deny the charges of sockpuppetry, those accounts have nothing to do with me. Those other accounts maybe well be socks of each other but again have nothing to do with me. A check user will back that up. Also that stalking accusation is a bit strange. You're looking for something thats not there.Ovlem (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to see a check user run on this. I wouldn't be blown over if these accounts were socks of a better known editor, although I'm not suggesting any particular one, as I don't know! The edit histories show a remarkable knowledge of policy, edit summaries etc etcTraditional unionist (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. I want this over as soon as possible as both Traditional unionist and User:Ben W Bell have been reverting my good edits as I am a 'suspected sock'. Its quite corrupt. I expect an apology from those two editors when the evidence proves that I am not sock.Ovlem (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
None will be forthcoming. The evidence appears damming, and if it is incorrect, suspicions are nonetheless utterly warranted.
What evidence? I am disappointed to hear that. It is a poor reflection of yourself, as an editor and more importantly as a person.
  • Could someone just do a CU and put this to bed, and confirm or deny the allegations here. BigDuncTalk 17:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have added User:Pureditor to it (in case he is missed when checking for Wikipeire) and another recent case, Bell V Bell (here).
For whatever reason (no-one has explained it to me yet!) I am being accused of being a sock puppet of this editor. I would encourage a checkuser so people can stop bothering me!ThatsGrand (talk) 21:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ovlem&oldid=236112346"