Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends of the Lower Field River
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBisanz (talk | contribs) at 14:19, 1 October 2008 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Friends of the Lower Field River
- Friends of the Lower Field River (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an article about a local action group, which has references which show that it has commented in relation to various development proposals and studies. None of these show that it is a notable body. Individuals can comment on such proposals, without thereby becoming notable. There are no reports from daily newspapers indicating that its activities have had some impact on significant events for instance. Grahame (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete local organization, no evidence of notability per WP:ORG TravellingCari 15:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 15:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Below notable. Operating (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are 4000 landcare groups in Australia and there is no need to list this one if more notable ones are not. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable enough for own article, but please redirect to Field River. JRG (talk) 07:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.