Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mod objective

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser‎ | Case

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jheald (talk | contribs) at 18:13, 2 October 2008 (→‎Mod objective: + Kurdle12). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mod objective

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 17:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

New Followup Request

suspected to be a continuation of banned socks

  • Supporting evidence:
Kght (talk · contribs) This user has immediately resumed the contacts and discussions of the Davidamos socks -- even to the point of directly addressing LisaLiel on her talk page. SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kght has just appeared, and seems to be yet another sock of the same person. Can this be checked, please? And is there any way to prevent this serial abuser from being able to continue his misbehavior? -LisaLiel (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Adding . Appeared and steamed straight into talk page discussions (and village pump) just where the preious socks left off. Jheald (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Followup Request

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mod objective}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Mod objective

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 16:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

New Followup Request

suspected to be a continuation of banned socks

  • Supporting evidence:
72.3454.34TT (talk · contribs) This user immediately restored an edit from the Alleichem sock which was deleted by consensus [1] under the pretext of restoring consensus. When I asked LisaLiel to help me find the origin for this IP, this new user had apparently already added her to his watchlist (unlikely for a random user), and in fact this user added the same barnstar of dilligence to his user page that I had given LisaLiel for her work in helping to identify the Alleichem sock. The combination of selecting to restore an Alleichem edit, to watch LisaLiel's page, and to add to himself the same barnstar awarded to LisaLiel for helping to catch the last sock -- stretch credibility for this to be a new user. SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally -- the new user apparently had this page on his watchlist and deleted the evidence against him before I could contact him about the checkuser [2]. SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Mod objective

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 18:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

New Followup Request

suspected to be a continuation of banned socks

  • Supporting evidence:
Alleichem (talk · contribs) has resumed the previous pattern of Davidamos/Mod objective/La Bible/Knighthood, with similarly tendentious reverts on the same articles from the same POV, same timezone, same language being used -- and I've compared the IP addresses to the ones cited for Davidamos (all are from England). SkyWriter (Tim) (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(The following is copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Alleichem as posted by Lisaliel for an RfC on this username)
Looking at the edits of User:Davidamos (Aug 18-21, 2008), User:Mod_objective (Aug 22-27 2008), User:LaBible (Aug 27, 2008), User:Knighthood (Aug 29, 2008), and User:Alleichem (Sept 3-25, 2008), it seems there's a direct and continuous line of sockpuppetry and abuses here.
In addition, User:143.53.7.18 (Sept 25, 2008), User:143.53.7.76 (Sept 16, 2008), User:143.53.7.171 (Sept 15, 2008), User:143.53.7.169 (Sept 15, 2008), User:82.203.3.3 (corporate shared IP, so relevant edits Aug 21-Sept 2, 2008), and User:86.135.199.16 (Aug 25, 2008) all fall into the same exact timeframe, while presenting the same edits, content, and single issue articles.
It seems clear that David Amos is abusing Wikipedia to further a personal agenda. The question is how to stop him without banning everyone who works at the same company. -LisaLiel (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed that Alleichem is Mod objective. Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Confirmed accounts indef blocked. Tiptoety talk 18:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Mod objective

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 12:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Supporting evidence:
LaBible (talk · contribs) appeared [3] immediately after Mod objective (talk · contribs) had been warned (User talk:Mod objective#Yahweh lead), and then reported [4] for WP:3RR. Mod objective has since been blocked [5] for 31 hours. User:LaBible's edit is another revert exactly the same as Mod objective was blocked for, and the edit summary, citing WP:IAP (sic), appears to be a direct continuation of Mod objective's claim that his behaviour was justified by WP:IAR.
In the last five days the other accounts have also (exclusively) made edits with substantially the same agenda. If not the same user, they appear to members of the same fringe group. Jheald (talk) 12:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed that Mod objective, LaBible and Davidamos are one user. No comment on the IPs. Sam Korn (smoddy) 14:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: LaBible and Davidamos blocked indefniitely, Mod objective's block extended to 2 weeks. Will extend to indef if Mod uses accounts abusively in the future. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Followup request

Knighthood (talk · contribs) has just appeared. His first 4 edits continue the previous pattern of Davidamos/Mod objective/La Bible, with similarly tendentious reverts on the same articles from the same POV, same timezone, same language being used ("messy" lead, etc), and an odd 'taking up the baton' post on Mod objective's talk page. Jheald (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Highly  Likely - Alison ❤ 18:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Blocked and tagged. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Mod_objective&oldid=242548189"