Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creighton the Cretin (2nd nomination)

Creighton the Cretin

Unremarkable comic. No wanting to start an edit war here, so here's the afd. LAA Fan^sign _review 01:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What exactly does unremarkable mean? This seems a lot like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If this is your only reason for deletion, then I must say this a not a very good AfD nomination. Also, where did your comment on edit warring come from? If you are talking about when I removed the PROD, then per WP:Proposed deletion#Conflicts, you aren't allowed to add it back anyways. In any case, although I might support your notion that the article should be deleted (it is incredibly in-universe with no reliable sources to indicate notability), your nomination statement of "Unremarkable comic." has much to be desired. Artichoker[talk] 01:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me clarify, because I usually don't write a very detailed AFD. The edit warring was I didn't want to edit war with you over the deletion, no matter what type; I try to avoid that. I nominated because this an unremarkable "comic". The comic is from a fictional book. There are no real references. At the most, it should be merged with the book.--LAA Fan^sign _review 02:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

very weak delete hard to tell. What's with that references section? Thinboy00 @104, i.e. 01:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to have been deleted by AfD consensus just a couple weeks ago. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- —G716 <^T·_C> 01:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G4) — Recreation of material deleted per AfD. I don't know what else is there to explain here. Creator should've went to DRV first instead of recreating the article. MuZemike (talk) 02:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]