Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 02:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 02:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 02:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 02:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 02:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 03:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Image has been heavily post-processed to be more a work of art than, well, a photo of a coal tower. Delete. rootology (C)(T) 03:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Not a personal photo. Indeed nothing of great valu; it is a place holder, as the description says. As mentioned on the image description, a blocked user with mulitple sock identities repeatedly uploaded a copyright violation at this title. Hasn't been a problem in over a year, but also image title has been protected. If this is considered objectionable, perhaps it should be replaced with generic placeholder image like at Image:001.jpg. If it is deleted, I suggest deleting admin place this title on their watch list to help keep an eye on further problems here. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 03:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. rootology (C)(T) 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image that appears to be either potentially not owned by the user as described. No descriptions, explanations of what it is. Not likely we could incorporate this into any article. Delete. rootology (C)(T) 03:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Focus and quality isn't totally great, nothing of great value to save it. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The only place where this picture would be appropriate is the Furry fandom article, and possibly not even then. This image does not befit an encyclopedia; surely there are more tasteful images that could be used should the article require an image (which is debatable). seresin ( ¡? ) 03:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Keep The image has lasted here for many years interestingly only put up for deletion shortly after I put it up on my userpage. WP:CENSORED and wikipedia does not delete free license images just because they are old or unused or anything. If it is free license, it is kept. Are you ready for IPv6? (talk) 04:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is not true. People are allowed to use images purely for their userpage or non-article space. Are you ready for IPv6? (talk) 08:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This image serves no purpose on Wikipedia. Axl ¤ [Talk] 19:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is not true as if it was true than wikipedia should delete the billions of free license images that exist purely for non-article space like userpages. Are you ready for IPv6? (talk) 08:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 03:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent fan art cover, no legitimate use. Found here, but the image does not match any known cover in any market. Source of the "Japan" claim is completely unknown. —Kww(talk) 04:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale claims its a CD cover. Source describes it as an "advertisement". No legitimate fair use rationale. —Kww(talk) 04:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned personal photo. Does not identify the subject with any information we could use to place it in an article. Doubtful use to the encyclopedia. rootology (C)(T) 04:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fatimid did not conquer all this land, This map is not even based on a relible map. It's a user's interest A M M A R 08:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This image is used in the Fatimid Caliphate article. If it's factually incorrect, that should be discussed at Talk:Fatimid Caliphate. Nominating the image for deletion is not appropriate until it has been decided by consensus that this image is unsuitable for the article. —Bkell (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan and Non-Fair use rationale of a photo/scan of a news paper article.(Copyright violation) Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]