Jump to content

Talk:The Rising (Keene novel)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 144.135.180.109 (talk) at 05:43, 13 October 2008 (→‎Possible Rip-Offs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNovels Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Apparently the experiment has opened some sort of interdimensional rift allowing these demons to possess the dead." Now, English might not be my first language, but doesn't this sound like something a 13-year old kid would write, not an encyclopedia article? Talber 09:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrianKeene TheRising.jpg

Image:BrianKeene TheRising.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Wife

it say he killed his second wife both before and after getting a call from his son. Sherzo 15:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheRising Leisure.jpg

Image:TheRising Leisure.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Rip-Offs

Err, does anyone else notice the uncanny similarities between this novel and the novel Cell and the film 28 days later? Possibly worth mentioning?144.135.180.109 (talk) 07:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see it myself. Also you would need verifiable sources for any such commentary. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean plot wise.144.135.180.109 (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]