User talk:Pseudo daoist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leszek Jańczuk (talk | contribs) at 18:50, 11 June 2009 (→‎Thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Responses

If I write a comment on your talk page, please respond there, not here.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology Talk

Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I found a place for your dual expertise. Graphology Wiki

Do take a look and let me know what you think.

Regards, have a great day.

Bhekare (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

e-Sword Talk

Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relgiously Orientated Distributions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Bible_study_Software is a draft for a page. I didn't know about Bible software when I started my draft.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes for New Users

Deletion Guidelines

Unofficial guidelines

jonathon (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Else

If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Namespace vios

I have:

But if they are going to be used, why don't you put them in the Template: namespace? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm learning how to create templates. I want to make sure that I have the correct data, in the correct place, and that it will do what I think it will do, before shifting them into Template: space.

I thought I had made them both in user:Pseudo daoist/* space.  :(

I'm obviously too tired to be doing anything on Wiki. jonathon (talk) 10:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration Template

Thanks

Thanks, Jonathan, for getting the disambiguation paragraph re-established in the Churches of Christ Article. Eternal vigilance seems to be what it takes to keep anonymous editors from "fixing it." I saw the change immediately, but I really want to keep my edits on that article to a minimum because I am not part of the CoC's. Well Done! John Park (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised you didn't make that change, when you changed back the other info. Whilst I think that the disambiguation paragraph is too long, I can't see a reasonable way of triming it, and still have it reflect the theological diversity that mandates umpteen articles on what is, in theory, one "denomination". jonathon (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List omitted verses

RSV has this verse. What is your problem? This is not list of merged verses but omitted.