User talk:Pseudo daoist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) at 15:58, 23 July 2009 (warn). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Responses

If I write a comment on your talk page, please respond there, not here.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology Talk

Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I found a place for your dual expertise. Graphology Wiki

Do take a look and let me know what you think.

Regards, have a great day.

Bhekare (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

e-Sword Talk

Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relgiously Orientated Distributions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Bible_study_Software is a draft for a page. I didn't know about Bible software when I started my draft.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes for New Users

Deletion Guidelines

Unofficial guidelines

jonathon (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Else

If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Namespace vios

I have:

But if they are going to be used, why don't you put them in the Template: namespace? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm learning how to create templates. I want to make sure that I have the correct data, in the correct place, and that it will do what I think it will do, before shifting them into Template: space.

I thought I had made them both in user:Pseudo daoist/* space.  :(

I'm obviously too tired to be doing anything on Wiki. jonathon (talk) 10:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration Template

Thanks

Thanks, Jonathan, for getting the disambiguation paragraph re-established in the Churches of Christ Article. Eternal vigilance seems to be what it takes to keep anonymous editors from "fixing it." I saw the change immediately, but I really want to keep my edits on that article to a minimum because I am not part of the CoC's. Well Done! John Park (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised you didn't make that change, when you changed back the other info. Whilst I think that the disambiguation paragraph is too long, I can't see a reasonable way of triming it, and still have it reflect the theological diversity that mandates umpteen articles on what is, in theory, one "denomination". jonathon (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List omitted verses

RSV has this verse. What is your problem? This is not list of merged verses but omitted. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Rorschach test, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]