User talk:Pseudo daoist

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pseudo_daoist.

This is Pseudo daoist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Responses

If I write a comment on your talk page, please respond there, not here.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology Talk

Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

e-Sword Talk

Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relgiously Orientated Distributions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Bible_study_Software is a draft for a page. I didn't know about Bible software when I started my draft.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes for New Users

Deletion Guidelines

Unofficial guidelines

WP:CONG : Notable churches or congregation
WP:SCHOOL : Notable Schools

jonathon (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Else

If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred text?

You are going to need to provide neutral citations to the effect that the text are sacred. Without it - and without achieving consensus in discussion - I am not going to allow what appears to be biased descriptives to be allowed to the article. I am engaged int he discussion. Until its concluded, it would be splendid you could abstain from reverting the word back in. thanks. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 06:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please vote

here Slrubenstein | Talk 02:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology 'POV pushing'

Hi, I was wondering if you could explain to me what exactly about my moving text from the end of the lead to the beginning is POV pushing? If it's considered a pseudoscience - which we can happily assume that it is, given the references (and current scientific studies), surely that information should be in the first sentence of the lead - it's rather important! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]