User talk:Aecis

Aecis is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

For the archived messages, see:

/Messages 1-12 (August 2004 - July 2005)
/Messages 13-24 (July - August 2005)
/Messages 25-36 (September - November 2005)
/Messages 37-48 (November - December 2005)
/Messages 49-60 (December 2005 - January 2006)
/Messages 61-72 (January 2006)
/Messages 73-84 (January - February 2006)

Fish for you

I hereby grant you a fish

  _/\___
 /~     \_/|
<__  __/  \|
   \/

Spread the fish, you may copy this fish and use it on your userpage. Asdfwtf 23:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wysun

I honestly don't know. I just know that I've had a run-in with a guy obsessed with male bikini wearing, and he may or may not be related to the User:TheBadTaxMan series of vandals (though he may have a different name now, possibly related to Wikipedia is Communism) who constantly recreated things like Jocker City. It's just something familiar, and I see no reason to wait for him to recreate the article again. --Golbez 22:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete? Now? ...How About Now?

All righty then...I got the Peach picture off the site...I think I responded to all your posts...now can I delete your sections on my talk page? My page is rather awkward and clumsy, and I need to get rid of the pointless/already answered sections. Aye, mate?

Flameviper12 01:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks please

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you. Nfitz 15:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for placing the template on my user talk page. I have no idea what my personal attack was though. Perhaps you could tell me? Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo^risin' 16:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In Talk:Jyllands-Posten_Muhammad_cartoons_controversy#Move cartoons down the page to reduce offense.3F you told me to "get real". This is an insult and is not civil. It is to this that I refer. Nfitz 16:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I disagree with you. Telling someone to "get real" may be harsh, but it is neither an insult nor a personal attack. I must therefore inform you that I will consider your message not sent. Aecis Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo^risin' 16:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Of course it's an insult. I've been using the phrase in that context since the 1970's. Besides if you had meant merely to be harsh, I don't think that's warranted either. Why be harsh with someone just because you disagree with them. Please remain civil. Not sure what you mean by "not sent"; message appears to have been transmitted and received or you would not have responded - I just don't get what your saying here. Nfitz 16:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Telling someone to get real is nowhere near an insult. If I had insulted you, I would have used terms like moron, idiot, loser, asshole, buttwipe etc. But I have not used those terms, I do not intend to use them, and I don't even see a reason to use them, because you are none of them. With "I will consider your message not sent", I meant the following: I have read your messages, I have thought about them, but I see nothing that comes even close to a personal attack, so I will ignore what you have said and I will not change my behaviour. Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo ^risin' 16:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        In my opinion you can add the use of the phrase "get real" when directed to an individual. Sure, not as strong as the examples you cite; but I don't think the use of such phrases serves to elevate the level of discussion Nfitz 16:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Perhaps it doesn't elevate the level of the discussion, but sometimes it's necessary. Like in this case. And if you can't take it, then I suggest you grow some skin (or is that a personal attack as well?). Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo ^risin' 16:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        I think this would be the case where trying to elevate the level of the discussion is most important! Real people are dying over this issue, so clearly some reactions are a little out of hand! And yes, I would consider that a personal attack as well, and I think on that one (though perhaps not the previous), you would agree if you carefully read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Nfitz 16:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created tempalte Template:Muhammad cartoons and placed it in two article already. Remove the "see also" or "main article" and replace it with this template.

that's amazing - we have a huge discussion on how to avoid insulting readers by showing the cartoons (e.g. putting a warning before showing them etc.) & now you come up with a way to show them on each & every article Rajab 15:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC). And you don't even sign your name....[reply]

We were not having a discussion on that, you (plural) were talking to us about that. That does not constitute a dialogue towards avoiding offense. Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo ^risin' 15:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that's interesting - you don't consider Muslims as equal on wikipedia? Of course *we* (wikipedians) had a discussion about that. Just have a look at the 9 archives Rajab 18:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What? Where on earth did you get that from? Where have I ever said anything that remotely resembles this nonsense? There has been no discussion on how to avoid offense. There have been only requests by you (plural) towards others to please consider moving the image. Requests do not constitute a discussion/dialogue. Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo ^risin' 20:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like how if i create a nonsesne artile it floats my without anyone noticing and never ever gets deleted

I may have been the only contributor to the article, but I was not the only contibutor to its talk page. That is why I put a db template on the page itself.

Lee S. Svoboda tɑk 23:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on the talk page for 64.12.116.201

Please read Wikipedia:Civility before posting such messages, even if it is on the talk page of a frequent vandal. Thanks. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 23:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry about jumping to conclusions before I had checked that page. Please disregard my request. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 23:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Meisel

Get real, Aecis. David Meisel is the UK's answer to LeBron James. Just because you haven't heard of Myze (or LeBron?), doesn't mean you should delete a harmless informative article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChingyFanatic (talk • contribs)

Checkuser results

Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser#Tina_M._Barber_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29.2C_Trillhill_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29.2C_70.35.67.56_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_and_207.200.116.133_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29 has been completed. Fred Bauder 22:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Meisel

I am NOT David Meisel, smart guy. You're an embarrassment to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.166.35 (talk • contribs)

User:Jasonaforbes

Please can I find out why my page "Talk:Slavatonia" was deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonaforbes (talk • contribs)

Tina M. Barber and Shiloh

A Request for Arbitration has been filed with respect to the Shiloh Shepherd Dog controversy. Can you substantiate the matter of Tina M. Barber calling the employer of an editor?

The arbitration proceeding is getting out of control and is becoming an exchange of ventings of anger. Many editors have misbehaved, but I agree with you that the actions of Tina M. Barber were horrendous. Robert McClenon 15:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic peace theory (Specific historic examples)

Please reconsider your decision to put on Afd; this exact text has already been through AfD, and was deleted, with only my dissent. See the present AfD discussion for details. Septentrionalis 17:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I masked it for better prose flow: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Rummel is always right.Septentrionalis 19:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Simply blanking works just as easily"

Thank you for blanking the Talk:Philip Danforth Armour page. I would have done so myself, except that in a similar situation, an admin had said that listing it for speedy deletion was the right thing to do. Which is it? Can you point to a Wikipedia policy reference? Hu 01:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please userfy Neoplorgismanteau

Greetings, Aecis! Can I trouble you to undelete Neoplorgismanteau and userfy it to a subpage of my main page? Cheers! BDAbramson T 15:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! BDAbramson T 15:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VWN en WCN

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, Effeietsanders 25 feb 2006 12:27 (CET)