Talk:Hallel

Judaism B‑class Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Chatzi is not half in hebrew. hasi is half in hebrew.

I do not believe this is correct. Chatzi (חצי) does translate as half. Josh Lee_TALK 12:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Recording

The Hallel isnow available as a public domain recording at http://www.archive.org/details/tanakh_jps_14_hallel_0712_librivox or http://librivox.org/the-hallel-psalms-113-118-translated-by-the-jewish-publication-society/ SSherris (talk) 05:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Place of this article among Psalms articles

This article finds a place on the psalms series box, but it is focused on the liturgical use of the Hallel in Jewish worship. In Christian tradition, all of Pss. 120-134 come as a unit called the "Gradual Psalms". It seems to me that it would be good to leave this article as is, also create a Gradual Psalms article, and then have neither referenced from the psalms series box--but perhaps start work on individual psalms within the set. What think ye all? Tb (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously that was incoherent. They change the clocks and my brain goes haywire. Anyway, forget that last paragraph, and start over. What I mean is that this article is focused on Jewish liturgical use, which seems appropriate especially give the title, and thus should perhaps not be in the box for the psalms in general--but individual psalm articles should be, and each would obviously link here as a See Also. What say ye all? Tb (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Hallel

Is there any specific reason why what is effectively the same line about the great hallel appears twice in this article. As the second occurance seems more contextually appropriate, I think that if there is no good reason not to, the first reference should be cut out. If anyone thinks otherwise, post a reason in the next few days or I'm going to assume i have the go ahead to cut out the line.g.j.g (talk) 03:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]