Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia naming issue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Irpen (talk | contribs) at 20:07, 20 March 2006 (→‎Discussion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Russia naming issue

Found in the cleanup backlog: an unsourced, NPOV, possibly original research article claiming a conspiracy to rename Russia as Muscovy. Unencyclopedic. Merge anything verifiable to Etymology of Rus and derivatives and delete. Alba 18:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete—this seems to be a troll: nothing of merit here, unless someone wants to find references in support of a few facts in the timeline. Michael Z. 2006-03-20 18:25 Z
  • Indeed, the name of Russia predated the name of Muscovy in the western tradition, however unhappy our Polish and Ukrainian friends may feel about the fact. Yet the wording of the article is POVish. It needs to be NPOVed and wikified, that's all. So keep and expand on the model of Name of Ukraine. Or perhaps eventually merge to Etymology of Rus and derivatives? --Ghirla -трёп- 18:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep and cleanup, perhaps merge, but POV problems is not a reason for deletion. Factual information on timeline is totally correct and useful. Interpretations are presented in a partisan and argumentive form. Needs cleanup but not the deletion. --Irpen 19:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Despite the fact that there may be some correct facts in this article, I see no basis for the existence of the article itself. Just for the record, can someone state in a neutrally-worded sentence or two, what exactly is the "Russia naming issue"? Citation of at least one respectable source would help, too. Michael Z. 2006-03-20 19:29 Z

The issue is the existance of the claim that the "Rus" rooted name self-appelation (Russia, Rossia, Rus' Velikaya, etc) was "stolen" by the Muscovites for the political purposes, that the correct name is Muscovites and Muscovy (which I don't disagree, these were also correct names) and the Russia and Rus' are incorrect and stolen. That "they" "stole" or "attempted to steal" or "to monopolize" the legacy of Rus', that ony we are related to Rus' and Muscovites owe their legacy only to Mongolic or Finno-Ugric tribes, that "we are more Rus'ian" then them" (see this article in Ukrainian or in Russian for a good review). Finally, if you go to uk-wiki, you can find users who deny to call Russin things as "Russian" even today and agree to only call it Muscovite (see this. --Irpen 20:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]