User talk:Rrfayette
——————————————— TALK PAGE ———————————————
Notice: Please have the courtesy to create new sub-headings two levels below the chief header "The Talks", otherwise I may not get back; despite the relatively high probability that I will place it in the proper location, I may not respond, and plus, you should never anything up to chance. Read the Laws.
- Brief exchanges will be deleted if a reply is not needed or when I have responded to them.
- Talks will be deleted when they are resolved or simply over.
Greetings! Please Fix My User Page!
Hello, this is the talk page of user SolelyFacts. Please respect this page as you do any other pages on Wikipedia. Read the guidelines that Wikipedia has suggested, and try to follow them -- please -- as well as those below. Thanks!
History does not repeat itself; people do: Special Occasions: |
Laws to consider for Discourse
From my experiences, these laws are now necessary. They have significant pratical purposes and are here to guide and organize the deliberation. Please follow them if you would like the best response. Feel free to update as necessary.
On Organizational Structure
- Discussions are organized in reversed chronological order.
- That means to start talk section above other's talks
- All creation of new headers subsequent to "The Talks" shall say "[Your Username] Talks"
- If you have more than one talk, they be ordered accordingly (Talk1, Talk2, Talk3, etc.).
- Discussions are organized in reversed chronological order.
On Behaviors
- Most important: Do not talk if it is not important or substantial-- think prior to acting.
- Be nice and happy! Yay!
- No need for excessive manners, but try -- just try -- to be civil
- Absolutely No Attacks
- Please, no petty remarks. Likely to be kept. Trying to see who fails to learn witty discourse.
- Rest may be deleted, but more likely be placed in the Tainted Cell of Silence & Disorder.
- Vandalism is acceptable only on this page
On Writing Style
- Only earnest and intelligent discourse -- supported with detailed reasons -- presented with skilled argumentation, tact, and remarkable finesse
- Write with accuracy and precision
- To help lessen and even prevent misunderstanding and miscommunication.
- Write with conciseness and clarity
- For clear, crisp, and efficient communication, lacking wasteful speech
- No redundancy and perhaps a hint of grace and charm
Laws should be disobeyed, altered and abolished if they have no significant pratical purposes, or limit us from our objectives and prime aspiration.
Special Events-- "For Better or Worse"
The Creation of the Basket
The Creation of the Cell
“ | I for one am a happy child who does not admire trapping entities -- people, ideas, objects even -- into confined areas where their freedoms will be inhibited and infringed upon, but at times, the limits of freedoms are crossed beyond bearability, in which case -- I am remorsed to do so, as it is against my core beliefs -- they must be locked and chained up in a prision-like hell forever! | ” |
Humble Quotations by me
“ | As I walk by the many talk pages of varous articles, it is beyond me to see the insanity that flourishes and lives so negatively active on these pages, which consumes the life of these users. It makes you wonder what great things they could be striving for. | ” |
The Talks
The following are individuals who like talking with me. (Some like to talk at me)
Click Edit & Start new sub-heading -- "[Your Username] Talks" -- below this one
Radiant Talks
Talk3
Third opinion is found at WP:3O. Mediation in disputes is available at WP:TINMC. In either case I would advise against characterising your opponents as wikistalking attackers. (Radiant) 16:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk2
Try this. Or this. >Radiant< 14:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Testing<font color=blue>Facts</font><font color=green>Only</font> 14:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Do you have the 'raw signature' checkbox set? You should. >Radiant< 14:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
TestingSolelyFacts 16:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC) SolelyFacts 16:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk1
As you've probably noticed I've protected this page for the time being. I find the differences between both versions rather minor and hardly worth edit warring over. I believe you both equally guilty of edit warring, and have no intention of blocking either of you. My recommendation would be to drop a note on e.g. WP:3O to get a third opinion; other than that, have a nice cup of WP:TEA and happy editing. >Radiant< 12:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)