Talk:Most common words in English

Length of the lists

Since I began this article and reworked this topic, two editors have attempted to add words to the lists (without sources, too). I have reverted these additions for the following reasons:

The lists that are in place are from a calculation done by Ask Oxford, what I'd consider a reliable source. I think it's reasonable that any additions to the lists must either come from the same study, or replace the whole list at once. We should not be mixing sources or adding unsourced material to an already sourced list.

Furthermore, do we really need or want more than 25 words per type (do we care especially about the 40th)? or 100 lemmas absolutely? I don't see why we should. If better, longer lists are found, it's probably best that we link to them, not include them directly: this is a general purpose encyclopedia for the average curious man (who I think will be satisfied with the length of these), not a source of data for the aspiring linguist.

Before increasing the length of these lists (very tempting, I know), please consider the above arguments and respond here so that we may discuss it. -- Rmrfstar 09:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The words and their ranks I added are based on the same corpus. -- Dissident (Talk) 17:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

As for your second point, Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, so there is no reason to arbitrarily limit oneself as long as the supplied info remains verifiable. -- Dissident (Talk) 15:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)