Abrams v. United States: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:4322:43, 8 February 2024‎ Doomsdayer520 talk contribs‎ 22,049 bytes −529‎ →‎See also: cleaned up "See also" which seemed to have grown into a piecemeal list of cases roughly related to free speech rather than those directly connected to Abrams undo
curprev 22:3122:31, 8 February 2024‎ Doomsdayer520 talk contribs‎ m 22,578 bytes +1‎ →‎Majority opinion undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 14:5614:56, 30 September 2023‎ RGKMA talk contribs‎ m 22,573 bytes −3‎ Removed comma(s) before "Jr." as per MOS:JR undo

curprev 11:2711:27, 31 May 2023‎ CarpCharacin talk contribs‎ 22,576 bytes +91‎ Add overruling info to infobox undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 16:5116:51, 29 May 2023‎ Provincialcowboy talk contribs‎ m 22,485 bytes 0‎ changed 'materiel' to correct spelling undo

curprev 11:2411:24, 8 May 2023‎ Hairy Dude talk contribs‎ 22,485 bytes +4‎ spelling material → materiel (neither word used in the opinion itself) undo

curprev 19:5619:56, 12 August 2022‎ Fluffy89502 talk contribs‎ m 22,495 bytes +30‎ Fixed grammar undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

curprev 02:4902:49, 10 May 2022‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 22,465 bytes +14‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} undo
curprev 00:4800:48, 10 May 2022‎ Tospik talk contribs‎ m 22,451 bytes +20‎ →‎Holmes's dissent undo

curprev 17:2217:22, 29 April 2022‎ Ffffrr talk contribs‎ 22,431 bytes −1‎ Changing short description from "U.S. Supreme Court case, 1919" to "1919 U.S. Supreme Court case" (Shortdesc helper) undo

curprev 05:0205:02, 16 April 2022‎ 76.210.33.19 talk‎ 22,432 bytes −311‎ The dissenting section read as an opinion rather than a clear statement of what Holmes wrote (e.g. "draconian" was used to describe the sentence). I removed fluffy wording and added more direct quotes from Holme's argument. However, I kept the overall message. Also, removed the joining dissenter as he is listed in the sidebar and the majority opinion does not list joining justices. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:2515:25, 16 February 2022‎ Davide King talk contribs‎ 22,392 bytes +52‎ {{short description|U.S. Supreme Court case, 1919}} undo

curprev 16:2916:29, 18 December 2021‎ 216.165.95.168 talk‎ 22,340 bytes −32‎ No edit summary undo