Appeal to novelty: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stevertigo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
correct Latin name |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''appeal to novelty''' (also called '''argumentum ad |
The '''appeal to novelty''' (also called '''argumentum ad novitatem''') is a [[logical fallacy]] in which someone claims that his or her idea or proposal is correct or superior because it is new and modern. Some examples are: |
||
* "Hovercars are the wave of the future! You should invest all your money in Hovercar stocks." (Hovercars may be futuristic, but that does not necessarily make them a sound financial investment.) |
* "Hovercars are the wave of the future! You should invest all your money in Hovercar stocks." (Hovercars may be futuristic, but that does not necessarily make them a sound financial investment.) |
||
* "This computer was made in 2003, therefore it is far superior to that computer made in 2001." (Although computer speed is increasing, one should consider actual specifications rather than mere date-of-construction.) |
* "This computer was made in 2003, therefore it is far superior to that computer made in 2001." (Although computer speed is increasing, one should consider actual specifications rather than mere date-of-construction.) |
||
Appeals to novelty are often successful in a [[modern]] world where everyone is eager to be on the "cutting edge" of technology. The so-called "[[Dot-com |
Appeals to novelty are often successful in a [[modern]] world where everyone is eager to be on the "cutting edge" of technology. The so-called "[[Dot-com]] bust" of the early 2000s could easily be interpreted as a sign of the dangers of naïvely embracing new ideas without first viewing them with a critical eye. Also, [[Advertising|advertisers]] frequently extoll the newness of their products as a reason to buy. |
||
The opposite of an appeal to novelty is an [[appeal to tradition]], in which one argues that the "old ways" are always superior to new ideas. |
The opposite of an appeal to novelty is an [[appeal to tradition]], in which one argues that the "old ways" are always superior to new ideas. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Logical fallacies]] |
[[Category:Logical fallacies]] |
||
[[he:אד נוביטם]] |
|||
[[he:%D7%90%D7%93_%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%91%D7%99%D7%98%D7%9D]] |
|||
Revision as of 13:54, 12 July 2005
The appeal to novelty (also called argumentum ad novitatem) is a logical fallacy in which someone claims that his or her idea or proposal is correct or superior because it is new and modern. Some examples are:
- "Hovercars are the wave of the future! You should invest all your money in Hovercar stocks." (Hovercars may be futuristic, but that does not necessarily make them a sound financial investment.)
- "This computer was made in 2003, therefore it is far superior to that computer made in 2001." (Although computer speed is increasing, one should consider actual specifications rather than mere date-of-construction.)
Appeals to novelty are often successful in a modern world where everyone is eager to be on the "cutting edge" of technology. The so-called "Dot-com bust" of the early 2000s could easily be interpreted as a sign of the dangers of naïvely embracing new ideas without first viewing them with a critical eye. Also, advertisers frequently extoll the newness of their products as a reason to buy.
The opposite of an appeal to novelty is an appeal to tradition, in which one argues that the "old ways" are always superior to new ideas.
See also: radicalism